IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2pe61-e69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Involvement of patients’ perspectives on treatment with noninvasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Helle Marie Christensen
  • Lotte Huniche
  • Ingrid L Titlestad

Abstract

Aims and objectives To clarify chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients’ perspectives on treatment with noninvasive ventilation and develop management strategies for the treatment based on these perspectives. Background The effect of treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with noninvasive ventilation is well‐documented, as is the problem of patient difficulties in tolerating the treatment. Knowledge of how patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease experience and evaluate treatment with noninvasive ventilation is limited; therefore, more information of patient perspectives is needed to develop treatment practices in respiratory medicine. Method This study is based on critical psychological practice research. Design A co‐researcher group comprising diverse health professionals was set up and headed by the principal researcher. The group convened seven times over 12 months to develop new management strategies based on patients’ perspectives on noninvasive ventilation. Health professionals contributed with experience‐based perspectives, and the researcher contributed with data from participant observation in the department and semi‐structured interviews with 16 patients and four relatives. Results Interviews revealed that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease regarded noninvasive ventilation treatment positively even though they experienced discomfort and anxiety. Patients’ perspectives revealed that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease conduct their everyday lives with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease looking at chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a basic life condition rather than an illness. This approach had a major impact on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients’ attitudes to noninvasive ventilation treatment and hospitalisation. Conclusion Investigation of patient perspectives generated results that were highly productive in facilitating multidisciplinary collaboration and in developing and sustaining new management strategies. Critical psychological practice research facilitated ongoing development of clinical practice related to noninvasive ventilation treatment. Relevance to clinical practice Focus on patients’ perspectives in treatment with noninvasive ventilation resulted in the development of new management strategies regarding patient care, joint ward rounds, and in addition, one room at the ward, to which a nurse was assigned, was designated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients treated with noninvasive ventilation.

Suggested Citation

  • Helle Marie Christensen & Lotte Huniche & Ingrid L Titlestad, 2018. "Involvement of patients’ perspectives on treatment with noninvasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 61-69, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e61-e69
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13847
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olivier Van Hove & Alexis Gillet & Jérôme Tack & Gregory Reychler & Magda Guatteri & Asuncion Ballarin & Justine Thomas & Rolando Espinoza & Frédéric Bonnier & Michelle Norrenberg & Pauline Daniel & M, 2022. "Development of a Medium Care Unit Using an Inexperienced Respiratory Staff: Lessons Learned during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e61-e69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.