IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i5-6p735-750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of therapeutic conversation intervention among caregivers of people with eating disorders: quasi‐experimental design

Author

Listed:
  • Margret Gisladottir
  • Janet Treasure
  • Erla Kolbrun Svavarsdottir

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic conversation intervention in group and caregiver sessions on the supporting role of caregivers. Background Caregivers of people with eating disorders are known to suffer major difficulties and are in great need of support. Unhelpful parental support strategies can delay the recovery of an individual with an eating disorder. Skill training interventions can equip parents with skills, guidance and techniques by helping them to be a support person and making them one of the most important links in the treatment process. Design The therapeutic conversation intervention consisted of five group and caregiver sessions and three booster sessions. The Calgary Family Assessment and Calgary Family Intervention Models, the Illness Beliefs Model and the New Maudsley Method were used as theoretical frameworks. The content of the intervention consisted of work on difficult behaviours, feelings and helpful strategies. The participants (n = 58) included primary and secondary caregivers of 12‐ to 24‐year‐old patients with eating disorders. Eight caregivers dropped out of treatment. Methods This study had a quasi‐experimental design with one pre‐ and two post‐test measures. Results Between 90–96% of caregivers rated the therapeutic conversation intervention as supportive. Furthermore, the study revealed significant differences in caregiver emotional and cognitive support, illness beliefs, disruptive behaviour and quality of life, negative aspects of care giving demands and caregiver and patient behavioural difficulties after the intervention and/or at follow‐up. Conclusions Therapeutic conversation intervention with caregivers in group and private sessions proved to be beneficial. Relevance to clinical practice This outcome provides information for healthcare professionals on how they can help primary caregivers in their supporting role, which can, in turn, improve services in healthcare centres and psychiatric hospitals.

Suggested Citation

  • Margret Gisladottir & Janet Treasure & Erla Kolbrun Svavarsdottir, 2017. "Effectiveness of therapeutic conversation intervention among caregivers of people with eating disorders: quasi‐experimental design," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5-6), pages 735-750, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:5-6:p:735-750
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13412
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:5-6:p:735-750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.