IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i3-4p427-435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical nurses’ knowledge and practice of venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prevention in South Korea: a cross‐sectional survey

Author

Listed:
  • Hyunjin Oh
  • Sunjoo Boo
  • Jung‐Ah Lee

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine Korean registered nurses’ level of perceived knowledge and practice of venous thromboembolism risk assessment as well as prevention, self‐efficacy in venous thromboembolism care and actual knowledge of venous thromboembolism. Background For hospitalised patients, venous thromboembolism is a preventable clinical disorder. Caring for venous thromboembolism patients requires coordination across multiple providers and settings. Clinical nurses can play a major role in improving venous thromboembolism prevention care, assessing venous thromboembolism risks and providing appropriate prophylactic measures to those who are at risk for venous thromboembolism. Design A cross‐sectional descriptive study. Methods Anonymous paper‐based surveys were conducted for a convenience sample of registered nurses’ (n = 452) from two university‐affiliated hospitals in South Korea. Results The majority of participants indicated that their overall self‐rated venous thromboembolism knowledge was ‘fair’, while only 2·4% rated it as ‘very good’ or ‘excellent’. The overall mean score of the venous thromboembolism knowledge questions was 50·9 (±13·0) of a possible score of 100. The mean score of self‐efficacy in practising venous thromboembolism prevention/prophylaxis was 3·0 (based on a one to five Likert scale). The self‐reported venous thromboembolism assessment performance on patients varied among clinical units. Only 9·3% of participants reported having received in‐service venous thromboembolism education from their hospital. Conclusions The findings showed that overall venous thromboembolism knowledge and self‐efficacy in venous thromboembolism prevention practices of Korean registered nurses’ were not highly rated. Korean nurses demonstrated a lack of knowledge about venous thromboembolism, particularly in the areas of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis measures and venous thromboembolism diagnosis methods. Relevance to clinical practice Focused education on venous thromboembolism prevention and risk assessment should be considered a component of continuing education for Korean nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyunjin Oh & Sunjoo Boo & Jung‐Ah Lee, 2017. "Clinical nurses’ knowledge and practice of venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prevention in South Korea: a cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 427-435, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:427-435
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13424
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Wang & Xin‐Juan Wu & Yu‐Fen Ma & Yuan Xu & Xiao‐Jie Wang & Chen Zhu & Jing Cao & Jing Jiao & Ge Liu & Zhen Li & Ying Liu & Li‐Yun Zhu, 2021. "Chinese orthopaedic nurses' knowledge, attitude and venous thromboembolic prophylactic practices: A multicentric cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 773-782, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:427-435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.