IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i3-4p379-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advanced Nursing Process quality: Comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA‐International (NANDA‐I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC)

Author

Listed:
  • Eneida Rejane Rabelo‐Silva
  • Ana Carla Dantas Cavalcanti
  • Maria Cristina Ramos Goulart Caldas
  • Amália de Fátima Lucena
  • Miriam de Abreu Almeida
  • Graciele Fernanda da Costa Linch
  • Marcos Barragan da Silva
  • Maria Müller‐Staub

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the quality of the advanced nursing process in nursing documentation in two hospitals. Background Various standardised terminologies are employed by nurses worldwide, whether for teaching, research or patient care. These systems can improve the quality of nursing records, enable care continuity, consistency in written communication and enhance safety for patients and providers alike. Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods A total of 138 records from two facilities (69 records from each facility) were analysed, one using the NANDA‐International and Nursing Interventions Classification terminology (Centre 1) and one the International Classification for Nursing Practice (Centre 2), by means of the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes instrument. Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes scores range from 0–58 points. Nursing records were dated 2012–2013 for Centre 1 and 2010–2011 for Centre 2. Results Centre 1 had a Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes score of 35·46 (±6·45), whereas Centre 2 had a Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes score of 31·72 (±4·62) (p

Suggested Citation

  • Eneida Rejane Rabelo‐Silva & Ana Carla Dantas Cavalcanti & Maria Cristina Ramos Goulart Caldas & Amália de Fátima Lucena & Miriam de Abreu Almeida & Graciele Fernanda da Costa Linch & Marcos Barragan , 2017. "Advanced Nursing Process quality: Comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA‐International (NANDA‐I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC)," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 379-387, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:379-387
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13387
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Gómez-Salgado & Lia Jacobsohn & Fátima Frade & Macarena Romero-Martin & Carlos Ruiz-Frutos, 2018. "Applying the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Nursing Assessment of Population Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-8, October.
    2. Juh Hyun Shin & Gui Yun Choi & Jiyeon Lee, 2021. "Identifying Frequently Used NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses, NOC Outcomes, NIC Interventions, and NNN Linkages for Nursing Home Residents in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Åsa Muntlin Athlin, 2018. "Methods, metrics and research gaps around minimum data sets for nursing practice and fundamental care: A scoping literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2230-2247, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:379-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.