IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p5004-5015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Saving lives with caring assessments: How Tanzanian nurse‐midwives and obstetricians negotiate postpartum practices

Author

Listed:
  • Thecla W Kohi
  • Megan Aston
  • Lilian T Mselle
  • Danielle Macdonald
  • Columba Mbekenga
  • Gail Tomblin Murphy
  • Maureen White
  • Shawna OHearn
  • Sheri Price
  • Keisha Jefferies

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the nurse‐midwives’ and obstetricians’ experiences delivering postpartum care assessments and how it was constructed through personal, social and institutional discourses. Introduction The Tanzanian Government has prioritised maternal and child health as an urgent healthcare issue. Nurse‐midwives and obstetricians are the two main providers of care throughout the prenatal and postpartum periods. Design A qualitative design guided by a feminist poststructuralist methodology. Methods Ten nurse‐midwives and three obstetricians from three Regional Hospitals in Dar es Salaam participated in individual semi‐structured in‐depth interviews. Results Assessment emerged as a significant theme with three subthemes. Nurse‐midwives shared their beliefs and values about assessments that focused on the safety of mothers and babies. They felt proud working with mothers and babies and shared their frustrations having to deal with inadequate working conditions. Guidelines and practices were part of the institutional discourse that impacted the day‐to‐day experiences of nurse‐midwives and obstetricians. The nurse‐midwives held the belief that it was vital to complete a comprehensive assessment to identify danger signs, keep mothers and babies safe and look for any abnormalities. They were concerned that mothers were being sent home too early. Conclusions Nurse‐midwives’ experiences in the provision of postpartum care portray that these health providers work heartedly to make sure that the mothers and their newborns receive the best care they can provide. The health system is challenged to address the needed supplies and equipment for reproductive health in particular postpartum care services. Relevance to clinical practice Institutional health discourses significantly affect the practice of nurse‐midwives and obstetricians to deliver timely and effective postpartum assessments. Immediate and ongoing postpartum assessments conducted by nurse‐midwives and obstetricians can save lives. This study presents the first theme of the study: Caring assessments save lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Thecla W Kohi & Megan Aston & Lilian T Mselle & Danielle Macdonald & Columba Mbekenga & Gail Tomblin Murphy & Maureen White & Shawna OHearn & Sheri Price & Keisha Jefferies, 2017. "Saving lives with caring assessments: How Tanzanian nurse‐midwives and obstetricians negotiate postpartum practices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 5004-5015, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5004-5015
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14000
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zenobia CY Chan & Kwan Sau Wong & Wing Man Lam & Ka Yi Wong & Yiu Cheung Kwok, 2014. "An exploration of postpartum women's perspective on desired obstetric nursing qualities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1-2), pages 103-112, January.
    2. Robert Black & Ramanan Laxminarayan & Marleen Temmerman & Neff Walker, 2016. "Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 23833, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neily Zakiyah & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Frank Roijmans & Maarten J Postma, 2016. "Economic Evaluation of Family Planning Interventions in Low and Middle Income Countries; A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Mohamed, Elwasila, 2018. "Bounds Test Cointegration Approach to Examine Factors Contributing to Declining Maternal Mortality Ratio in Sudan (1969-2015)," MPRA Paper 84952, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. María Dolores Pozo-Cano & Adelina Martín-Salvador & María Ángeles Pérez-Morente & Encarnación Martínez-García & Juan de Dios Luna del Castillo & María Gázquez-López & Rafael Fernández-Castillo & Inmac, 2020. "Validation of the Women’s Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) in the Spanish Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Simge Zeyneloğlu & Sezer Kısa & Hülya Özberk & Aysun Badem, 2017. "Predictors and measurement of satisfaction with postpartum care in a government hospital," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 198-203, June.
    5. Patricio V. Marquez, 2016. "Mental Health Among Displaced People and Refugees," World Bank Publications - Reports 25854, The World Bank Group.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5004-5015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.