IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4905-4914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ and nurse assistants’ beliefs, attitudes and actions related to role and function in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit—A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Mia I Loft
  • Ingrid Poulsen
  • Bente A Esbensen
  • Helle K Iversen
  • Lone L Mathiesen
  • Bente Martinsen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore nurses’ and nurse assistants’ beliefs, attitudes and actions related to their function in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. Background Several attempts have been made to describe nurses’ roles and functions in inpatient neurorehabilitation. However, current understandings of the contributions that nurses and nurse assistants make to neurorehabilitation remain sparse. Design Descriptive, interpretive qualitative study. Methods Participant observations were conducted during 1 month in a stroke rehabilitation unit at a university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. The observations were audiorecorded and field notes were taken on the spot. Semistructured interviews with nurses (N = 8) and nurse assistants (N = 6) were performed. The audiorecorded observations, field notes and interviews were transcribed for inductive and deductive content analysis. Results Three main categories with underlying subcategories were identified: (i) the importance of professionalism, (ii) striving for visibility, (iii) the importance of structure. Conclusion This study contributes to present understandings of nurses’ and nurse assistants’ roles and functions in inpatient stroke rehabilitation. We obtained insights into nursing staff's beliefs and attitudes about rehabilitation—as well as their own role and function—and furthermore how the latter affects their actions in daily practice. Relevance to clinical practice The nursing role and function are still not clearly defined. Further education is needed to strengthen the contribution of nursing staff to patients’ rehabilitation. Furthermore, focus on developing a professional language and a framework that supports continuity within daily care and rehabilitation is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mia I Loft & Ingrid Poulsen & Bente A Esbensen & Helle K Iversen & Lone L Mathiesen & Bente Martinsen, 2017. "Nurses’ and nurse assistants’ beliefs, attitudes and actions related to role and function in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4905-4914, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4905-4914
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13972
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J Clarke, 2014. "Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta‐ethnography," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1201-1226, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xianmei Meng & Xuemei Chen & Zhihui Liu & Lanshu Zhou, 2020. "Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: Perspectives from multi‐disciplinary healthcare professionals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 28-37, March.
    2. Ana Railka de Souza Oliveira-Kumakura & Cássia Milena Freitas Machado Sousa & Jessica Aparecida Biscaro & Kelly Cristina Rodrigues da Silva & Juliany Lino Gomes Silva & Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconce, 2021. "Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses Related to Self-Care Deficits in Patients with Stroke," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(4), pages 494-501, May.
    3. Robin Digby & Danielle Bolster & Leanne Hughes & Andrew Perta & Tracey K. Bucknall, 2020. "Examining subacute nurses’ roles in a changing healthcare context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2260-2274, July.
    4. Robin Digby & Danielle Bolster & Andrew Perta & Tracey K Bucknall, 2018. "The perspective of allied health staff on the role of nurses in subacute care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4089-4099, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin Digby & Danielle Bolster & Leanne Hughes & Andrew Perta & Tracey K. Bucknall, 2020. "Examining subacute nurses’ roles in a changing healthcare context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2260-2274, July.
    2. Robin Digby & Danielle Bolster & Andrew Perta & Tracey K Bucknall, 2018. "The perspective of allied health staff on the role of nurses in subacute care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4089-4099, November.
    3. Xianmei Meng & Xuemei Chen & Zhihui Liu & Lanshu Zhou, 2020. "Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: Perspectives from multi‐disciplinary healthcare professionals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 28-37, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4905-4914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.