IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4664-4674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nursing home survey on patient safety culture

Author

Listed:
  • Shu‐Yuan Lin
  • Wei Ting Tseng
  • Miao‐Ju Hsu
  • Hui‐Ying Chiang
  • Hui‐Chen Tseng

Abstract

Aims and objectives To test the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale among staff in long‐term care facilities. Background The Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale is a standard tool for safety culture assessment in nursing homes. Extending its application to different types of long‐term care facilities and varied ethnic populations is worth pursuing. Design A national random survey. Methods A total of 306 managers and staff completed the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale among 30 long‐term care facilities in Taiwan. Content validity and construct validity were tested by content validity index (CVI) and principal axis factor analysis (PAF) with Promax rotation. Concurrent validity was tested through correlations between the scale and two overall rating items. Reliability was computed by intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficients. Statistical analyses such as descriptive, Pearson's and Spearman's rho correlations and PAF were completed. Results Scale‐level and item‐level CVIs (0.91–0.98) of the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale were satisfactory. Four‐factor construct and merged item composition differed from the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale, and it accounted for 53% of variance. Concurrent validity was evident by existing positive correlations between the scale and two overall ratings of resident safety. Cronbach's α coefficients of the subscales and the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale ranged from .76–.94. Conclusions The Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale identified essential dimensions to reflect the important features of a patient safety culture in long‐term care facilities. The researchers introduced the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture for safety culture assessment in long‐term care facilities, but further testing of the reliability of the scale in a large Chinese sample and in different long‐term care facilities was recommended. Relevance to clinical practice The Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale was developed to increase the users’ intention towards safety culture assessment. It can identify areas for improvement, understand safety culture changes over time and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu‐Yuan Lin & Wei Ting Tseng & Miao‐Ju Hsu & Hui‐Ying Chiang & Hui‐Chen Tseng, 2017. "A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nursing home survey on patient safety culture," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4664-4674, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4664-4674
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13815
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tayyebeh Ali-Abadi & Siavash Talepasand & Christopher Boyle & Hamid Sharif Nia, 2020. "Psychometric properties of The Baruth Protective Factors Inventory among nursing students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4664-4674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.