IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4567-4573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient experiences and predictors in an acute geriatric ward: A cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen
  • Lars‐Petter Jelsness‐Jørgensen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate older peoples’ experiences with acute hospital treatment and care, and variables that may influence these experiences. Background In the Nordic countries, research on older peoples’ experiences with hospital care is sparse. Methods Participants were recruited from an acute geriatric ward in a hospital in Norway during a 1‐year period (n = 189). Patient experience was assessed using the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire, self‐rated health by Euro‐QoL 5‐dimension, three‐level version and comorbidity by Charlson comorbidity index. Results Responders’ median age was 79 years, 48.7% male. Most of the problems were related to continuity and transition, while fewest problems were related to respect for patient preferences. Charlson comorbidity index score and the variables “still working,” “in a relationship” and “living alone” negatively influenced patient experience. Conclusions A high amount of problems were identified among patients hospitalised in an acute geriatric ward. Findings from this study may provide important information about issues that need focus to increase the care experiences of older people. Relevance to clinical practice Results from this study adds to existing knowledge, and emphasize the need for increased focus on discharge and continuity of care processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen & Lars‐Petter Jelsness‐Jørgensen, 2017. "Patient experiences and predictors in an acute geriatric ward: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4567-4573, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4567-4573
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13796
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl & Ingela Karlsson & Marie Louise Hall‐Lord & Jari Appelgren & Bodil Wilde‐Larsson, 2011. "Quality of care from patients’ perspective: impact of the combination of person‐related and external objective care conditions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2540-2551, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susanne Gustavsson & Ida Gremyr & Elisabeth Kenne Sarenmalm, 2016. "Designing quality of care – contributions from parents : Parents’ experiences of care processes in paediatric care and their contribution to improvements of the care process in collaboration with heal," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 742-751, March.
    2. Riitta Suhonen & Minna Stolt & Agneta Berg & Jouko Katajisto & Chryssoula Lemonidou & Elisabeth Patiraki & Katarina Sjövall & Andreas Charalambous, 2018. "Cancer patients' perceptions of quality‐of‐care attributes—Associations with age, perceived health status, gender and education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 306-316, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4567-4573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.