IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4390-4403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to regaining control within a constructivist grounded theory of family resilience in ICU: Living with uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Wong
  • Pranee Liamputtong
  • Susan Koch
  • Helen Rawson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To discuss families’ experiences of their interactions when a relative is admitted unexpectedly to an Australian intensive care unit. Background The overwhelming emotions associated with the unexpected admission of a relative to an intensive care unit are often due to the uncertainty surrounding the condition of their critically ill relative. There is limited in‐depth understanding of the nature of uncertainty experienced by families in intensive care, and interventions perceived by families to minimise their uncertainty are not well documented. Furthermore, the interrelationships between factors, such as staff–family interactions and the intensive care unit environment, and its influence on families’ uncertainty particularly in the context of the Australian healthcare system, are not well delineated. Design A grounded theory methodology was adopted for the study. Methods Data were collected between 2009–2013, using in‐depth interviews with 25 family members of 21 critically ill patients admitted to a metropolitan, tertiary‐level intensive care unit in Australia. Results This paper describes the families experiences of heightened emotional vulnerability and uncertainty when a relative is admitted unexpectedly to the intensive care unit. Families uncertainty is directly influenced by their emotional state, the foreign environment and perceptions of being 'kept in the dark', as well as the interrelationships between these factors. Conclusion Staff are offered an improved understanding of the barriers to families’ ability to regain control, guided by a grounded theory of family resilience in the intensive care unit. Relevance to clinical practice The findings reveal in‐depth understanding of families’ uncertainty in intensive care. It suggests that intensive care unit staff need to focus clinical interventions on reducing factors that heighten their uncertainty, while optimising strategies that help alleviate it. Families are facilitated to move beyond feelings of helplessness and loss of control, and cope better with their situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Wong & Pranee Liamputtong & Susan Koch & Helen Rawson, 2017. "Barriers to regaining control within a constructivist grounded theory of family resilience in ICU: Living with uncertainty," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4390-4403, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4390-4403
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13768
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Sophie Ågård & Kirsten Lomborg, 2011. "Flexible family visitation in the intensive care unit: nurses’ decision‐making," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(7‐8), pages 1106-1114, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pauline Wong & Pranee Liamputtong & Susan Koch & Helen Rawson, 2019. "Searching for meaning: A grounded theory of family resilience in adult ICU," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 781-791, March.
    2. Jonas Karlsson & Thomas Eriksson & Berit Lindahl & Isabell Fridh, 2020. "Family members' lived experiences when a loved one undergoes an interhospital intensive care unit‐to‐unit transfer: A phenomenological hermeneutical study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3721-3730, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charlotte Handberg & Anna Katarina Voss, 2018. "Implementing augmentative and alternative communication in critical care settings: Perspectives of healthcare professionals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 102-114, January.
    2. Pauline Wong & Pranee Liamputtong & Susan Koch & Helen Rawson, 2019. "Searching for meaning: A grounded theory of family resilience in adult ICU," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 781-791, March.
    3. Pamela Page & Alan Simpson & Lisa Reynolds, 2019. "Bearing witness and being bounded: The experiences of nurses in adult critical care in relation to the survivorship needs of patients and families," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3210-3221, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4390-4403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.