IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i21-22p3529-3542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Just not for me’ – contributing factors to nonattendance/noncompletion at phase III cardiac rehabilitation in acute coronary syndrome patients: a qualitative enquiry

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Rudolf Herber
  • Karen Smith
  • Myra White
  • Martyn C. Jones

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore what reasons do nonattenders and noncompleters give for their patterns of participation or nonparticipation in cardiac rehabilitation programmes and how future uptake could be enhanced. Background Cardiac rehabilitation is a cost‐effective clinical intervention designed for adults with acute coronary syndrome. Despite evidence from meta‐analyses demonstrating that cardiac rehabilitation programmes facilitate physical and psychological recovery from acute coronary syndrome, only 20–50% of eligible patients attend Phase III outpatient programmes. Design A qualitative study using thematic analysis. Method Within the context of a larger mixed‐method study, acute coronary syndrome patients were recruited between 2012–2014 from three hospitals in Scotland. Of 214 patients who consented to enrol in the main study, a purposive subsample of 25 participants was recruited. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. Results Three major influences of participation were identified: (1) personal factors, (2) programme factors and (3) practical factors. In addition, valuable suggestions for future programme modifications were provided. A significant barrier to attending cardiac rehabilitation programmes is that participants perceived themselves to be unsuitable for the programme alongside a lack of knowledge and/or misconceptions regarding cardiac rehabilitation. Conclusion The responses of nonattenders and noncompleters revealed misconceptions related to programme suitability, the intensity of exercise required and the purpose of a cardiac rehabilitation programme. As long as these misconceptions continue to persist in coronary syndrome patients, this will impact upon attendance. The lack of perceived need for cardiac rehabilitation stems from a poor understanding of the programme, especially among nonattenders and noncompleters and subsequently an inability to comprehend possible benefits. Relevance to clinical practice The knowledge of common misconceptions puts clinical nurses in a better position to identify and pro‐actively address these erroneous assumptions in their patients in order to improve participation in cardiac rehabilitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Rudolf Herber & Karen Smith & Myra White & Martyn C. Jones, 2017. "‘Just not for me’ – contributing factors to nonattendance/noncompletion at phase III cardiac rehabilitation in acute coronary syndrome patients: a qualitative enquiry," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3529-3542, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3529-3542
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13722
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charlotte P Simonÿ & Birthe D Pedersen & Pia Dreyer & Regner Birkelund, 2015. "Dealing with existential anxiety in exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation: a phenomenological‐hermeneutic study of patients' lived experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2581-2590, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navin Kaushal & Donya Nemati & Raphaëlle Gauthier-Bisaillon & Marie Payer & Béatrice Bérubé & Martin Juneau & Louis Bherer, 2022. "How and Why Patients Adhere to a Prescribed Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: A Longitudinal Phenomenological Study of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Dorte Winther & Charlotte Kirkegaard Lorenzen & Pia Dreyer, 2020. "Everyday life experiences of close relatives of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis receiving home mechanical ventilation—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2306-2316, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3529-3542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.