IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i19-20p3232-3238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on survival of patients in a persistent vegetative state after stroke

Author

Listed:
  • Kunpeng Wu
  • Ying Chen
  • Caihong Yan
  • Zhijia Huang
  • Deming Wang
  • Peigen Gui
  • Juan Bao

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the effect of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on short‐ and long‐term survival of patients in a persistent vegetative state after stroke and determine the relevant prognostic factors. Background Stroke may lead to a persistent vegetative state, and the effect of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on survival of stroke patients in a persistent vegetative state remains unclear. Design Prospective study. Methods A total of 97 stroke patients in a persistent vegetative state hospitalised from January 2009 to December 2011 at the Second Hospital, University of South China, were assessed in this study. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was performed in 55 patients, and mean follow‐up time was 18 months. Survival rate and risk factors were analysed. Results Median survival in the 55 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy‐treated patients was 17·6 months, higher compared with 8·2 months obtained for the remaining 42 patients without percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy treatment. Univariate analyses revealed that age, hospitalisation time, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy treatment status, family financial situation, family care, pulmonary infection and nutrition were significantly associated with survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that older age, no gastrostomy, poor family care, pulmonary infection and poor nutritional status were independent risk factors affecting survival. Indeed, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy significantly improved the nutritional status and decreased pulmonary infection rate in patients with persistent vegetative state after stroke. Interestingly, median survival time was 20·3 months in patients with no or one independent risk factors of poor prognosis (n = 38), longer compared with 8·7 months found for patients with two or more independent risk factors (n = 59). Conclusion Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy significantly improves long‐term survival of stroke patients in a persistent vegetative state and is associated with improved nutritional status and decreased pulmonary infection. Relevance to clinical practice Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a promising option for the management of stroke patients in a persistent vegetative state.

Suggested Citation

  • Kunpeng Wu & Ying Chen & Caihong Yan & Zhijia Huang & Deming Wang & Peigen Gui & Juan Bao, 2017. "Effects of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on survival of patients in a persistent vegetative state after stroke," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3232-3238, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3232-3238
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13672
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3232-3238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.