IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i19-20p3174-3187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in self‐efficacy, collective efficacy and patient outcome following interprofessional simulation training on postpartum haemorrhage

Author

Listed:
  • Signe Egenberg
  • Pål Øian
  • Torbjørn Moe Eggebø
  • Mirjana Grujic Arsenovic
  • Lars Edvin Bru

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine whether interprofessional simulation training on management of postpartum haemorrhage enhances self‐efficacy and collective efficacy and reduces the blood transfusion rate after birth. Background Postpartum haemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, although it is preventable in most cases. Interprofessional simulation training might help improve the competence of health professionals dealing with postpartum haemorrhage, and more information is needed to determine its potential. Design Multimethod, quasi‐experimental, pre–post intervention design. Methods Interprofessional simulation training on postpartum haemorrhage was implemented for midwives, obstetricians and auxiliary nurses in a university hospital. Training included realistic scenarios and debriefing, and a measurement scale for perceived postpartum haemorrhage‐specific self‐efficacy, and collective efficacy was developed and implemented. Red blood cell transfusion was used as the dependent variable for improved patient outcome pre–post intervention. Results Self‐efficacy and collective efficacy levels were significantly increased after training. The overall red blood cell transfusion rate did not change, but there was a significant reduction in the use of ≥5 units of blood products related to severe bleeding after birth. Conclusion The study contributes to new knowledge on how simulation training through mastery and vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion and psychophysiological state might enhance postpartum haemorrhage‐specific self‐efficacy and collective efficacy levels and thereby predict team performance. The significant reduction in severe postpartum haemorrhage after training, indicated by reduction in ≥5 units of blood transfusions, corresponds well with the improvement in collective efficacy, and might reflect the emphasis on collective efforts to counteract severe cases of postpartum haemorrhage. Relevance to clinical practice Interprofessional simulation training in teams may contribute to enhanced prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage, shown by a significant increase in perceived efficacy levels combined with an indicated reduction of severe postpartum haemorrhage after training.

Suggested Citation

  • Signe Egenberg & Pål Øian & Torbjørn Moe Eggebø & Mirjana Grujic Arsenovic & Lars Edvin Bru, 2017. "Changes in self‐efficacy, collective efficacy and patient outcome following interprofessional simulation training on postpartum haemorrhage," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3174-3187, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3174-3187
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13666
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3174-3187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.