IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i17-18p2721-2734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The nursing work environment and quality of care: A cross‐sectional study using the Essentials of Magnetism II Scale in England

Author

Listed:
  • Titilayo O Oshodi
  • Rachel Crockett
  • Benjamin Bruneau
  • Elizabeth West

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the structure of the Essentials of Magnetism II (EOMII) scale using data from nurses working in England; and to describe the impact of different aspects of the nursing work environment on nurse‐assessed care quality (NACQ). Background The EOMII Scale was developed in the United States to measure nursing work environments. It has been widely used in the United States and in a number of other countries, but has not yet been used in the UK. Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods Registered nurses (n = 247) providing direct patient care in two National Health Service hospitals in England completed the EOMII scale and a single‐item measuring NACQ. Principal components analysis was used to assess the structure of the scale. Correlation and regression analyses were used to describe the relationships between factors and NACQ. Results A solution with explanatory variance of 45.25% was identified. Forty items loaded on five factors, with satisfactory consistency: (i) ward manager support; (ii) working as a team; (iii) concern for patients; (iv) organisational autonomy; and (v) constraints on nursing practice. While in univariate analyses, each of the factors was significantly associated with NACQ, in multivariate analyses, the relationship between organisational autonomy and NACQ no longer reached significance. However, a multiple mediation model indicated that the effect of organisational autonomy on NACQ was mediated by nurse manager support, working as a team and concern for patients but not constraints on nursing practice. Conclusions Subscales of the EOMII identified in an English sample of nurses measured important aspects of the nursing work environment, each of which is related to NACQ. Relevance to clinical practice The EOMII could be a very useful tool for measuring aspects of the nursing work environment in the English Trusts particularly in relation to the quality of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Titilayo O Oshodi & Rachel Crockett & Benjamin Bruneau & Elizabeth West, 2017. "The nursing work environment and quality of care: A cross‐sectional study using the Essentials of Magnetism II Scale in England," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2721-2734, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2721-2734
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13783
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2721-2734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.