IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i17-18p2558-2571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring relationships of catheter‐associated urinary tract infection and blockage in people with long‐term indwelling urinary catheters

Author

Listed:
  • Mary H Wilde
  • James M McMahon
  • Hugh F Crean
  • Judith Brasch

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe and explore relationships among catheter problems in long‐term indwelling urinary catheter users, including excess healthcare use for treating catheter problems. Background Long‐term urinary catheter users experience repeated problems with catheter‐related urinary tract infection and blockage of the device, yet little has been reported of the patterns and relationships among relevant catheter variables. Design Secondary data analysis was conducted from a sample in a randomised clinical trial, using data from the entire sample of 202 persons over 12 months' participation. Methods Descriptive statistics were used to characterise the sample over time. Zero‐inflated negative binomial models were employed for logistic regressions to evaluate predictor variables of the presence/absence and frequencies of catheter‐related urinary tract infection and blockage. Results Catheter‐related urinary tract infection was marginally associated with catheter blockage. Problems reported at least once per person in the 12 months were as follows: catheter‐related urinary tract infection 57%, blockage 34%, accidental dislodgment 28%, sediment 87%, leakage (bypassing) 67%, bladder spasms 59%, kinks/twists 42% and catheter pain 49%. Regression analysis demonstrated that bladder spasms were significantly related to catheter‐related urinary tract infection and sediment amount, and catheter leakages were marginally significantly and positively related to catheter‐related urinary tract infection. Frequencies of higher levels of sediment and catheter leakage were significantly associated with higher levels of blockage, and being female was associated with fewer blockages. Persons who need help with eating (more disabled) were also more likely to have blockages. Conclusions Catheter‐related urinary tract infection and blockage appear to be related and both are associated with additional healthcare expenditures. More research is needed to better understand how to prevent adverse catheter outcomes and patterns of problems in subgroups. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses can develop care management strategies to identify catheter blockage prior to its occurrence by tracking the amount of sediment and frequency of leakage. Bladder spasms could be an early warning of catheter‐related urinary tract infection.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary H Wilde & James M McMahon & Hugh F Crean & Judith Brasch, 2017. "Exploring relationships of catheter‐associated urinary tract infection and blockage in people with long‐term indwelling urinary catheters," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2558-2571, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2558-2571
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13626
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2558-2571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.