IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i1-2p238-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power and resistance within the hospital's hierarchical system: the experiences of chronically ill patients

Author

Listed:
  • Odette Griscti
  • Megan Aston
  • Grace Warner
  • Ruth Martin‐Misener
  • Deborah McLeod

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore experiences of chronically ill patients and registered nurses when they negotiate patient care in hospital settings. Specifically, we explored how social and institutional discourses shape power relations during the negotiation process. Background The hospital system is embedded in a hierarchical structure where the voice of the healthcare provider as expert is often given more importance than the patient. This system has been criticised as being oppressive to patients who are perceived to be lower in the hierarchy. In this study, we illustrate how the hospital's hierarchical system is not always oppressing but can also create moments of empowerment for patients. Design A feminist poststructuralist approach informed by the teaching of Foucault was used to explore power relations between nurses and patients when negotiating patient care in hospital settings. Methods Eight individuals who suffered from chronic illness shared their stories about how they negotiated their care with nurses in hospital settings. The interviews were tape‐recorded. Discourse analysis was used to analyse the data. Results and Conclusions Patients recounted various experiences when their voices were not heard because the current hospital system privileged the healthcare provider experts’ advice over the patients’ voice. The hierarchical structure of hospital supported these dynamics by privileging nurses as gatekeepers of service, by excluding the patients’ input in the nursing notes and through a process of self‐regulation. However, patients in this study were not passive recipients of care and used their agency creatively to resist these discourses. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses need to be mindful of how the hospital's hierarchical system tends to place nurses in a position of power, and how their authoritative position may positively or adversely affect the negotiation of patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Odette Griscti & Megan Aston & Grace Warner & Ruth Martin‐Misener & Deborah McLeod, 2017. "Power and resistance within the hospital's hierarchical system: the experiences of chronically ill patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 238-247, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:238-247
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13382
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nurfika Asmaningrum & Dini Kurniawati & Yun‐Fang Tsai, 2020. "Threats to patient dignity in clinical care settings: A qualitative comparison of Indonesian nurses and patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 899-908, March.
    2. Jesús Molina-Mula & Julia Gallo-Estrada, 2020. "Impact of Nurse-Patient Relationship on Quality of Care and Patient Autonomy in Decision-Making," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:238-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.