IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i7-8p1086-1094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress symptoms among adolescents before and after scoliosis surgery: correlations with postoperative pain

Author

Listed:
  • Anna‐Clara Rullander
  • Mats Lundström
  • Marie Lindkvist
  • Bruno Hägglöf
  • Viveca Lindh

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to describe stress symptoms among adolescents before and after scoliosis surgery and to explore correlations with postoperative pain. Background Scoliosis surgery is a major surgical procedure. Adolescent patients suffer from preoperative stress and severe postoperative pain. Previous studies indicate that there is a risk of traumatisation and psychological complications during the recovery period. Design A prospective quantitative cohort study with consecutive inclusion of participants. Methods A cohort of 37 adolescent patients aged 13–18. To assess the adolescents' experiences before surgery and at six to eight months after surgery, the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children – Alternative version, Youth Self‐Report and Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia for children 12–18 were used. The Visual Analogue Scale was used for self‐report of postoperative pain on day three. Results Rates of anxiety/depression and internalising behaviour were significantly higher before surgery than six months after. Preoperative anger, social problems and attention problems correlated significantly with postoperative pain on day three. At follow‐up, postoperative pain correlated significantly with anxiety, social problems and attention problems. Conclusions The results of this study indicate a need for interventions to reduce perioperative stress and postoperative pain to improve the quality of nursing care. Relevance to clinical practice Attention to preoperative stress and implementation of interventions to decrease stress symptoms could ameliorate the perioperative process by reducing levels of postoperative pain, anxiety, social and attention problems in the recovery period.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna‐Clara Rullander & Mats Lundström & Marie Lindkvist & Bruno Hägglöf & Viveca Lindh, 2016. "Stress symptoms among adolescents before and after scoliosis surgery: correlations with postoperative pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1086-1094, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1086-1094
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13137
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfhild Dihle & Gunnar Bjølseth & Sølvi Helseth, 2006. "The gap between saying and doing in postoperative pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 469-479, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsten Kaptain & Vibeke Bregnballe & Pia Dreyer, 2017. "Patient participation in postoperative pain assessment after spine surgery in a recovery unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2986-2994, October.
    2. Mohammed Ali Mohammed Kasasbeh & Catherine McCabe & Sheila Payne, 2017. "Action learning: an effective way to improve cancer‐related pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3430-3441, November.
    3. Joanne Harmon & Peter Summons & Isabel Higgins, 2019. "Experiences of the older hospitalised person on nursing pain care: An ethnographic insight," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4447-4459, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1086-1094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.