IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i3-4p445-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ attitude and intention of medication administration error reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Chang‐Chiao Hung
  • Tsui‐Ping Chu
  • Bih‐O Lee
  • Chia‐Chi Hsiao

Abstract

Aims and objectives The Aims of this study were to explore the effects of nurses’ attitudes and intentions regarding medication administration error reporting on actual reporting behaviours. Background Underreporting of medication errors is still a common occurrence. Whether attitude and intention towards medication administration error reporting connect to actual reporting behaviours remain unclear. Design This study used a cross‐sectional design with self‐administered questionnaires, and the theory of planned behaviour was used as the framework for this study. Methods A total of 596 staff nurses who worked in general wards and intensive care units in a hospital were invited to participate in this study. The researchers used the instruments measuring nurses’ attitude, nurse managers’ and co‐workers’ attitude, report control, and nurses’ intention to predict nurses’ actual reporting behaviours. Data were collected from September–November 2013. Path analyses were used to examine the hypothesized model. Results Of the 596 nurses invited to participate, 548 (92%) completed and returned a valid questionnaire. The findings indicated that nurse managers’ and co‐workers’ attitudes are predictors for nurses’ attitudes towards medication administration error reporting. Nurses’ attitudes also influenced their intention to report medication administration errors; however, no connection was found between intention and actual reporting behaviour. Conclusions The findings reflected links among colleague perspectives, nurses’ attitudes, and intention to report medication administration errors. The researchers suggest that hospitals should increase nurses’ awareness and recognition of error occurrence. Relevance to clinical practice Regardless of nurse managers’ and co‐workers’ attitudes towards medication administration error reporting, nurses are likely to report medication administration errors if they detect them. Management of medication administration errors should focus on increasing nurses’ awareness and recognition of error occurrence.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang‐Chiao Hung & Tsui‐Ping Chu & Bih‐O Lee & Chia‐Chi Hsiao, 2016. "Nurses’ attitude and intention of medication administration error reporting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 445-453, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:3-4:p:445-453
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13071
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mari Liukka & Markku Hupli & Hannele Turunen, 2019. "Problems with incident reporting: Reports lead rarely to recommendations," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1607-1613, May.
    2. Xi Yu & Ce Li & Xueqin Gao & Furong Liu & Ping Lin, 2018. "Influence of the medication environment on the unsafe medication behaviour of nurses: A path analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 2993-3000, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:3-4:p:445-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.