IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i23-24p3643-3651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to cervical cancer screening experienced by lesbian women: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Curmi
  • Kath Peters
  • Yenna Salamonson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To provide deeper insights into the experiences of lesbian women in accessing cervical cancer screening and to inform strategies to increase the uptake of these services for this group of women. Background Lesbian women continue to face significant health disparities and are at increased risk for specific medical conditions. With cervical cancer being largely a preventable disease, early detection through the Papanicolaou test is crucial, as it enables treatment to commence early and limit the progression of the disease. Although the rates of cervical abnormalities among lesbian women are similar to that of the general population, lesbian women are less likely to have regular cervical screening. The reasons for this are largely unknown and there is a paucity of research that explores cervical cancer screening in lesbian women. Design Qualitative descriptive design. Methods Participants (n = 9) were recruited via media release and those living in New South Wales who self‐identified as lesbian, meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Semi‐structured, face to face and telephone interviews were used to obtain narrative data from lesbian women on their experiences of cervical screening. Results Three main themes emerged from the data: ‘Lack of opportunistic screening’; ‘Fear of penetration’ and ‘Encountering heterosexism and discrimination’. Conclusions This current study builds on existing knowledge and further, has identified issues that have not been previously raised in the literature. New findings from this study highlight participants' fear of penetration, and stigma associated with accessing information, as substantial barriers to cervical screening. Relevance to clinical practice This study's findings can guide future research and highlight possibilities for specific strategies to reduce health disparities among lesbian women.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Curmi & Kath Peters & Yenna Salamonson, 2016. "Barriers to cervical cancer screening experienced by lesbian women: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(23-24), pages 3643-3651, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:23-24:p:3643-3651
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12947
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:23-24:p:3643-3651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.