IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i21-22p3160-3166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motives that head and neck cancer patients have for contacting a specialist nurse – an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Pär Salander
  • Joakim Isaksson
  • Brith Granström
  • Göran Laurell

Abstract

Aims and objectives The purpose of this study is to systematically explore the motives for patients with head and neck cancer to contact a specialist nurse during two years postdiagnosis. Background Research focusing on the role of specialist nurses in cancer care almost exclusively concern cancers other than head and neck cancer. Design Qualitative, descriptive study based on the contacts between patients with head and neck cancer and a specialist nurse. Methods Patients were invited to contact a specialist nurse by telephone. The specialist nurse took systematic field notes, that is, she registered who contacted her, the nature of the call and the outcome. Sixty patients were included. Results In descending order, the motives for contact were questions about practical and uncomplicated matters, consultations about medical troubles/worries, presenting a report of the patient's situation, requests for additional information about the treatment plan and requests for medical information. The pattern of the patients' motivations for calling was not related to medical or social factors, suggesting that the initiative to make contact is very much a question of the complexity of individual life circumstances. Very few referrals were sent from the specialist nurse to other professionals. Conclusions The specialist nurse turned out to be more than just a coordinator of health‐care resources. The findings bring up questions about the potential of the nurse's function as a coordinator, but also as a potential attachment figure, and questions about the nurse's relationships to other professionals. Relevance to clinical practice When implementing a specialist nurse function, it is important to decide whether the function should be inspired by a broader relational perspective. In addition to the indispensible competence and experience in the clinical field of head and neck cancer, training in counselling and acquaintance with object‐relational psychology will then be desirable.

Suggested Citation

  • Pär Salander & Joakim Isaksson & Brith Granström & Göran Laurell, 2016. "Motives that head and neck cancer patients have for contacting a specialist nurse – an empirical study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3160-3166, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3160-3166
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13283
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cecilia Arving & Inger Holmström, 2011. "Creating a new profession in cancer nursing? Experiences of working as a psychosocial nurse in cancer care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(19‐20), pages 2939-2947, October.
    2. Olivia Cook & Meredith McIntyre & Katrina Recoche, 2015. "Exploration of the role of specialist nurses in the care of women with gynaecological cancer: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 683-695, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalie Williams & Georgia Griffin & Victoria Farrell & Yvonne L. Hauck, 2020. "Gaining insight into the supportive care needs of women experiencing gynaecological cancer: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1684-1694, May.
    2. Andrea Kobleder & Hanna Mayer & Larissa Gehrig & Beate Senn, 2017. "“Promoting continuity of care”—Specialist nurses’ role experiences in gynaecological oncology: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4890-4898, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3160-3166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.