IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i19-20p2989-3000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the gap in sexual healthcare in nursing practice: implementing a sexual healthcare training programme to improve outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Su‐Ching Sung
  • Huey‐Hwa Jiang
  • Ru‐Rong Chen
  • Jian‐Kang Chao

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a sexual healthcare training programme for clinical nurses, with respect to knowledge, attitudes and self‐efficacy concerning sexual healthcare. Background Inadequate sexual healthcare can result in poor treatment and quality of life for patients. Few studies have examined the development of sexual healthcare and related interventions from nurses' perspectives. Design The study included two stages involving focus groups and a quasi‐experimental design. Methods The first stage consisted of an exploratory, descriptive session to assess nurses' perceptions and educational needs concerning sexual healthcare via two focus groups (N = 16). The second stage involved a quasi‐experimental session to evaluate the training programme, based on the results of the first stage. In total, 117 nurses were recruited from a Taiwanese hospital; the experimental group (n = 59) completed a four‐week (16 hours) training programme, and the control group (n = 58) did not participate in a training programme. Data were collected at four time points over 17 weeks. Longitudinal changes that occurred over time were examined using hierarchical linear models. Results The experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in knowledge (β = 0·16, p

Suggested Citation

  • Su‐Ching Sung & Huey‐Hwa Jiang & Ru‐Rong Chen & Jian‐Kang Chao, 2016. "Bridging the gap in sexual healthcare in nursing practice: implementing a sexual healthcare training programme to improve outcomes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2989-3000, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2989-3000
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13441
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leah East & Marie Hutchinson, 2013. "Moving beyond the therapeutic relationship: a selective review of intimacy in the sexual health encounter in nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3568-3576, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reginald Fennell & Blair Grant, 2019. "Discussing sexuality in health care: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3065-3076, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Pascale Blakey & Helen Aveyard, 2017. "Student nurses’ competence in sexual health care: A literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3906-3916, December.
    2. Christine Cassidy & Lisa Goldberg & Megan Aston, 2016. "The application of a feminist poststructural framework in nursing practice for addressing young women's sexual health," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2378-2386, August.
    3. Vicky Bungay & Ingrid Handlovsky & J Craig Phillips & Cheryl Prescott, 2017. "A scoping review of the literature on nursing practices with persons seeking care for sexually transmitted infections," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 33-48, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2989-3000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.