IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i19-20p2906-2920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing moving and handling as a complex healthcare intervention within the acute care of older people with osteoporosis: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Coulter Smith
  • Fiona O'May
  • Savina Tropea
  • Jackie Berg

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate healthcare staff's views and experiences of caring for older hospitalised adults (aged 60+) with osteoporosis focusing on moving and handling. Specific objectives were to explore the composition of manual handling risk assessments and interventions in osteoporosis. Background Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease that reduces bone density and causes increased fracture risk. Incidence rises with age and osteoporotic fractures cause increased morbidity and mortality. It is a major global health problem. In the UK older hospitalised adults are normally screened for falls risk but not necessarily for osteoporosis. As presentation of osteoporosis is normally silent until fractures are evident, it is frequently undiagnosed. Healthcare staff's knowledge of osteoporosis is often suboptimal and specific manual handling implications are under‐researched. Design An exploratory qualitative content analysis research design informed by critical realism. Methods The purposive sample comprised 26 nursing and allied health professionals. Semi‐structured interviews addressed topics including knowledge of osteoporosis, implications for acute care, moving and handling and clinical guidelines. Qualitative content data analysis was used. Results Awareness of osteoporosis prevalence in older populations varies and implications for nursing are indistinct to nonspecialists. In‐hospital fractures potentially linked to suboptimal moving and handling seemed rare, but prospective studies are needed. Categories of ‘Understanding moving and handling as routine care or as a healthcare intervention’, with further categories ‘healthcare practitioners’ capacities and capabilities for dealing with people with osteoporosis’ and ‘the structural and organisational context for moving and handling’ are reported alongside safety, frailty and dependency dimensions. Conclusions This study informs moving and handling in higher risk groups such as osteoporosis. Clinical knowledge/expertise is required when adapting generic manual handling guidelines to specific patients/contexts. Patients’ experiences of moving and handling have received limited attention. Relevance to clinical practice Increased focus on musculoskeletal conditions and moving and handling implications is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Coulter Smith & Fiona O'May & Savina Tropea & Jackie Berg, 2016. "Framing moving and handling as a complex healthcare intervention within the acute care of older people with osteoporosis: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2906-2920, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2906-2920
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13344
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2906-2920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.