IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i19-20p2778-2785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of emergency department nursing services and patient satisfaction of services

Author

Listed:
  • Mukadder Mollaoğlu
  • Pelin Çelik

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify nursing services and assess patient satisfaction in patients who present to the emergency department. Background Emergency nursing care is a significant determinant of patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction is often regarded as a reliable indicator of the quality of services provided in the emergency department. Design This is a descriptive study. Methods Eighty‐four patients who presented to the university emergency department were included in the study. The study data were collected by the Patient Information Form and the Satisfaction Level Form. Results Emergency nursing services, including history taking, assessing vital signs, preparing the patient for an emergency intervention, oxygen therapy, drug delivery and blood‐serum infusion were shown to be more commonly provided compared with other services such as counselling the patients and the relatives about their care or delivering educational and psychosocial services. However, 78·6% of the patients were satisfied with their nursing services. The highest satisfaction rates were observed in the following sub‐dimensions of the Satisfaction Level Form: availability of the nurse (82·1%), behaviour of the nurse towards the patient (78·6%) and the frequency of nursing rounds (77·4%). Conclusions The most common practices performed by nurses in the emergency department were physical nursing services. Patient satisfaction was mostly associated with the availability of nurses when they were needed. Our results suggest that in addition to the physical care, patients should also receive education and psychosocial care in the emergency department. Relevance to clinical practice We believe that this study will contribute to the awareness and understanding of principles and concepts of emergency nursing, extend the limits of nursing knowledge and abilities, and improve and maintain the quality of clinical nursing education and practice to train specialist nurses with high levels of understanding in ethical, intellectual, administrative, investigative and professional issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukadder Mollaoğlu & Pelin Çelik, 2016. "Evaluation of emergency department nursing services and patient satisfaction of services," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2778-2785, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2778-2785
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13272
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Venke Sørlie & Kirsti Torjuul & Anita Ross & Mona Kihlgren, 2006. "Satisfied patients are also vulnerable patients – narratives from an acute care ward," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(10), pages 1240-1246, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin-Hwa Lee & In-Ok Sim, 2021. "Analysis of the Relationship between the Psychological Well-Being, Emotional Intelligence, Willpower, and Job-Efficacy of Clinical Nurses: A Structural Model Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Gülten S. Dağ & Songül Bişkin & Meral Gözkaya, 2019. "Determination of nursing procedures and competencies in emergency departments: A cross‐sectional study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 307-315, September.
    3. Sarah Watkins & Fiona Murphy & Catriona Kennedy & Belinda Dewar & Margaret Graham, 2019. "Caring for an older person with dementia in the Emergency Department (ED): An Appreciative Inquiry exploring family member and ED nurse experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2801-2812, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanessa Heaslip & Sarah Hean & Jonathan Parker, 2018. "The etemic model of Gypsy Roma Traveller community vulnerability: is it time to rethink our understanding of vulnerability?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(17-18), pages 3426-3435, September.
    2. May Bazzi & Maud Lundèn & Karin Ahlberg & Ingegerd Bergbom & Mikael Hellström & Solveig M. Lundgren & Isabell Fridh, 2020. "Patients’ lived experiences of waiting for and undergoing endovascular aortic repair in a hybrid operating room: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 810-820, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2778-2785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.