IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i1-2p269-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking the intensive care environment: considering nature in nursing practice

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Minton
  • Lesley Batten

Abstract

Aims and objectives With consideration of an environmental concept, this paper explores evidence related to the negative impacts of the intensive care unit environment on patient outcomes and explores the potential counteracting benefits of ‘nature‐based’ nursing interventions as a way to improve care outcomes. Background The impact of the environment in which a patient is nursed has long been recognised as one determinant in patient outcomes. Whilst the contemporary intensive care unit environment contains many features that support the provision of the intensive therapies the patient requires, it can also be detrimental, especially for long‐stay patients. Design This narrative review considers theoretical and evidence‐based literature that supports the adoption of nature‐based nursing interventions in intensive care units. Methods Research and theoretical literature from a diverse range of disciplines including nursing, medicine, psychology, architecture and environmental science were considered in relation to patient outcomes and intensive care nursing practice. Conclusion There are many nature‐based interventions that intensive care unit nurses can implement into their nursing practice to counteract environmental stressors. These interventions can also improve the environment for patients’ families and nurses. Relevance to clinical practice Intensive care unit nurses must actively consider and manage the environment in which nursing occurs to facilitate the best patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Minton & Lesley Batten, 2016. "Rethinking the intensive care environment: considering nature in nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 269-277, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:1-2:p:269-277
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:1-2:p:269-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.