IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i7-8p1048-1058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients and nursing staff views of using the education needs assessment tool in rheumatology clinics: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Bernadette Hardware
  • Dawn Johnson
  • Claire Hale
  • Mwidimi Ndosi
  • Adewale Adebajo

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the usability of the educational needs assessment tool in clinical practice, from a practitioner and patient perspective and to establish whether patients perceive that they are getting an equally good or equally inadequate education service for their needs. Background The educational needs assessment tool was developed to enable patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis to assess their education needs prior to a consultation with a health professional. The educational needs assessment tool has been translated into nine languages and measurement properties have been established, however, its usability in clinical practice has not been studied. Design A qualitative study embedded into a multicentre RCT in which patients had been randomised into either educational needs assessment tool‐focused education (Experimental Group) or usual care (control group). Methods Both groups were seen by a clinical nurse specialist. Sixteen patients and four clinical nurse specialists were recruited from the Rheumatology Outpatient Departments of three Acute Hospitals within the U K. Data were collected by interviews with patients and clinical nurse specialist. Analysis followed the Framework approach. Results Patients and clinical nurse specialist found completion of the educational needs assessment tool straightforward, comprehensive and easy to use. Completing the educational needs assessment tool helped patients to focus on what they needed to know from the clinical nurse specialist. Patients in both the control group and the experimental group felt supported and reassured by their clinical nurse specialist and perceived that they received a good and adequate education provision. Conclusion This study provides useful insights into the ability of the educational needs assessment tool to assess the educational needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical practice. Relevance to clinical practice The educational needs assessment tool would be useful as a structured guide for nurses when assessing and meeting individual patient educational needs. This has the potential to improve patient‐centred care, involve patients more actively in their care and enhance the long‐term effects of patient education provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernadette Hardware & Dawn Johnson & Claire Hale & Mwidimi Ndosi & Adewale Adebajo, 2015. "Patients and nursing staff views of using the education needs assessment tool in rheumatology clinics: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 1048-1058, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:7-8:p:1048-1058
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12733
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ingrid Larsson & Stefan Bergman & Bengt Fridlund & Barbro Arvidsson, 2012. "Patients' experiences of a nurse‐led rheumatology clinic in Sweden: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 501-507, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denise Nana Pleh & Elizabeth Rosted & Thora Grothe Thomsen, 2021. "Key competences of outpatient nurses, as perceived by patients attending nurse‐led clinics – An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 311-322, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:7-8:p:1048-1058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.