IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i5-6p832-843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowing ‘something is not right’ is beyond intuition: development of a clinical algorithm to enhance surveillance and assist nurses to organise and communicate clinical findings

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Brier
  • Moalem Carolyn
  • Marsha Haverly
  • Mary Ellen Januario
  • Cynthia Padula
  • Ahuva Tal
  • Henia Triosh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop a clinical algorithm to guide nurses' critical thinking through systematic surveillance, assessment, actions required and communication strategies. To achieve this, an international, multiphase project was initiated. Background Patients receive hospital care postoperatively because they require the skilled surveillance of nurses. Effective assessment of postoperative patients is essential for early detection of clinical deterioration and optimal care management. Despite the significant amount of time devoted to surveillance activities, there is lack of evidence that nurses use a consistent, systematic approach in surveillance, management and communication, potentially leading to less optimal outcomes. Several explanations for the lack of consistency have been suggested in the literature. Design Mixed methods approach. Methods Retrospective chart review; semi‐structured interviews conducted with expert nurses (n = 10); algorithm development. Results Themes developed from the semi‐structured interviews, including (1) complete, systematic assessment, (2) something is not right (3) validating with others, (4) influencing factors and (5) frustration with lack of response when communicating findings were used as the basis for development of the Surveillance Algorithm for Post‐Surgical Patients. Conclusion The algorithm proved beneficial based on limited use in clinical settings. Further work is needed to fully test it in education and practice. Relevance to clinical practice The Surveillance Algorithm for Post‐Surgical Patients represents the approach of expert nurses, and serves to guide less expert nurses' observations, critical thinking, actions and communication. Based on this approach, the algorithm assists nurses to develop skills promoting early detection, intervention and communication in cases of patient deterioration.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Brier & Moalem Carolyn & Marsha Haverly & Mary Ellen Januario & Cynthia Padula & Ahuva Tal & Henia Triosh, 2015. "Knowing ‘something is not right’ is beyond intuition: development of a clinical algorithm to enhance surveillance and assist nurses to organise and communicate clinical findings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 832-843, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:5-6:p:832-843
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12670
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emily Rohde & Elizabeth Domm, 2018. "Nurses’ clinical reasoning practices that support safe medication administration: An integrative review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 402-411, February.
    2. Claire Foley & Maura Dowling, 2019. "How do nurses use the early warning score in their practice? A case study from an acute medical unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1183-1192, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:5-6:p:832-843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.