IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i3-4p386-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quality improvement programme with a specialist nurse in a neurovascular clinic

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline McKee
  • Carrie Wade
  • Mark O McCarron

Abstract

Aims and objectives To measure the impact of a quality improvement programme with a stroke specialist nurse and increased capacity at neurovascular clinics. Background Transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke are medical emergencies prompting urgent assessment and treatment. Delays in specialist assessment and management are frequent and may increase stroke risk. Design Pre‐ and post evaluation of intervention. Methods All patients referred to a neurovascular clinic were recorded during two phases: 2006–2008 and 2010–2012. For the 2010–2012 period, a stroke specialist nurse contacted all patients with appointment details, provided driving advice and asked for an eyewitness to attend the clinic. Diagnosis, delay in specialist assessment, prevalence of transient ischaemic attack/minor stroke as confirmed at the clinic and compliance with UK driving regulations were measured and compared before and after this intervention. Results A total of 1327 patients were assessed in the two study phases. Referrals to the neurovascular service increased without a decrease in the prevalence of transient ischaemic attack/minor stroke. Delays from clinical event to assessment were decreased for referrals from 36·5–13 days, and adherence to the UK driving restrictions improved for confirmed transient ischaemic attack/minor stroke patients from 61–94%. Fewer patients failed to attend a neurovascular appointment arranged by the stroke specialist nurse than those who failed a general neurology appointment arranged by partial booking. Conclusions This quality improvement programme reduced delays for all referred patients, improved compliance with driving regulations and demonstrated efficient use of neurovascular clinic spaces. Increasing local capacity may unmask more transient ischaemic attack/minor stroke patients. Relevance to clinical practice A stroke nurse can help improve the efficiency of a neurovascular clinic and improve patient safety with driving advice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline McKee & Carrie Wade & Mark O McCarron, 2015. "A quality improvement programme with a specialist nurse in a neurovascular clinic," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 386-392, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:386-392
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12609
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie Considine & Bree McGillivray, 2010. "An evidence‐based practice approach to improving nursing care of acute stroke in an Australian Emergency Department," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 138-144, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnes T. Black & Shazbeen Ali & Jennifer Baumbusch & Kate McNamee & Martha Mackay, 2019. "Practice‐based nursing research: Evaluation of clinical and professional impacts from a research training programme," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2681-2687, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:386-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.