IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i23-24p3441-3448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' perceptions of their professional practice environment: a cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Yingjuan Cao
  • Michelle DiGiacomo
  • Yenna Salamonson
  • Ye Li
  • Baosha Huai
  • Patricia M Davidson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe nurses’ perceptions concerning their professional practice environment in mainland China and identify factors associated with these views. Background Globally, the environments in which nurses work influence the quality of nursing practice and health care. Design A cross‐sectional descriptive survey using both paper‐ and online‐based delivery modes was used. Method A convenience sampling method was used. The survey questionnaire was composed of sociodemographic items and the 38‐item Chinese version of Professional Practice Environment survey. The content of the paper‐based questionnaire was identical to the online survey. Pearson's chi‐square test was conducted to compare the demographic characteristics of these two data sets. Descriptive statistics analysis included frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. Multiple linear regression analysis using the Backwards method was applied to identify independent predictors of each subscale of the 38‐item Chinese version of Professional Practice Environment. Results A total of 573 questionnaires were analysed. The mean score of each subscale of the 38‐item Chinese version of Professional Practice Environment in this study ranged from 2·66–3·05. All subscales except work motivation (3·05, standard deviation: 0·44) scored less than 3·0. Areas rated as most in need of improvement included control over practice, interpersonal interaction, supportive leadership and handling conflict, and staff relationships with physicians and autonomy. Conclusion This study has identified nurses’ perspectives regarding their workplaces in contemporary China. These data have provided an important baseline for developing and implementing culturally appropriate strategies to improve the working environment of Chinese nurses. Relevance to clinical practice A supportive and enabling work environment promotes professional development and the safety and quality of health care. Addressing these factors is important in optimising work place environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingjuan Cao & Michelle DiGiacomo & Yenna Salamonson & Ye Li & Baosha Huai & Patricia M Davidson, 2015. "Nurses' perceptions of their professional practice environment: a cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3441-3448, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:23-24:p:3441-3448
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12953
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renáta Zeleníková & Darja Jarošová & Ilona Plevová & Eva Janíková, 2020. "Nurses’ Perceptions of Professional Practice Environment and Its Relation to Missed Nursing Care and Nurse Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-10, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:23-24:p:3441-3448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.