IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i19-20p3006-3015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compassion: a critical review of peer‐reviewed nursing literature

Author

Listed:
  • Graham McCaffrey
  • Shelagh McConnell

Abstract

Aims and objectives To provide a critical review of nursing literature about compassion, identifying major themes, questions arising and directions for future investigation of the topic. Background Compassion has emerged as a topic of broad social concern in recent years and is particularly pertinent to nurses. Design Critical review was selected as the most appropriate way of analysing literature from both qualitative research studies and conceptual articles. Methods An electronic database search was conducted, discovering articles published between 1952 and 2013. The search was then limited to publications since 2000 to capture recent development of the concept. The search was limited to peer‐reviewed literature, excluding a large body of editorial material, resulting in 20 relevant articles. Two books were also added that contributed important perspective to the analysis. Critical analysis of the resulting material was undertaken to identify themes, tensions and implications in the literature. Results Major themes were compassion as practice and compassion as a moral virtue, holding implications for how nurses can demonstrate compassion in relation to contemporary healthcare values. A third major theme was the influence of institutional environments in facilitating or limiting the expression of compassion. Conclusions Compassion is a human experience of deep significance to nursing and needs understanding in the context of healthcare environments dominated by discourses of efficiency and rationalisation. There is an emergent literature about how compassion may be understood, taught and sustained among nurses but it is a topic that requires continued attention. Relevance to clinical practice More precise understanding of compassion will support nurses in advocating for compassionate care, participating in interdisciplinary dialogue, and contributing to the design of healthcare environments that are conducive to compassionate care.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham McCaffrey & Shelagh McConnell, 2015. "Compassion: a critical review of peer‐reviewed nursing literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 3006-3015, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:19-20:p:3006-3015
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12924
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorothy Horsburgh & Janis Ross, 2013. "Care and compassion: the experiences of newly qualified staff nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(7-8), pages 1124-1132, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær, 2021. "Newly graduated nurses’ socialisation resulting in limiting inquiry and one‐sided use of knowledge sources—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 701-711, March.
    2. Jacinta Kelly, 2014. "Commentary on Horsburgh D and Ross J (2013) Care and compassion: experiences of newly qualified staff nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing 22, 1124–1132," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2382-2383, August.
    3. Pavneet Singh & Shelley Raffin‐Bouchal & Susan McClement & Thomas F Hack & Kelli Stajduhar & Neil A Hagen & Aynharan Sinnarajah & Harvey M Chochinov & Shane Sinclair, 2018. "Healthcare providers’ perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators of compassion: Results from a grounded theory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2083-2097, May.
    4. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Mette Grønkjær & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2017. "Newly graduated nurses’ use of knowledge sources in clinical decision‐making: an ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1313-1327, May.
    5. Viviana Davalos-Batallas & Ana-Magdalena Vargas-Martínez & Patricia Bonilla-Sierra & Fatima Leon-Larios & Maria-de-las-Mercedes Lomas-Campos & Silvia-Libertad Vaca-Gallegos & Rocio de Diego-Cordero, 2020. "Compassionate Engagement and Action in the Education for Health Care Professions: A Cross-Sectional Study at an Ecuadorian University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Paul Crawford & Brian Brown & Marit Kvangarsnes & Paul Gilbert, 2014. "The design of compassionate care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3589-3599, December.
    7. Joanne Durkin & Kim Usher & Debra Jackson, 2019. "Embodying compassion: A systematic review of the views of nurses and patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1380-1392, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:19-20:p:3006-3015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.