IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i7-8p1144-1152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient factors associated with incidents of aggression in a general inpatient setting

Author

Listed:
  • Rosalyn Williamson
  • Kate Lauricella
  • Alexandra Browning
  • Elizabeth Tierney
  • Josephine Chen
  • Stephen Joseph
  • Julie Sharrock
  • Tom Trauer
  • Bridget Hamilton

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine patient factors associated with aggressive (code grey) events in the setting of a metropolitan hospital during a six‐month period, to inform screening and prevention practices. Background Patient aggression continues to place nurses and patients at risk. Nurses need to be able to identify situations that are likely to escalate into aggression in order to ensure their own safety and the quality of care they can provide. Research has focussed on emergency departments and psychiatric units. Approaches that are appropriate for these settings may not fit for the general inpatient setting. Design A structured audit and epidemiological analysis of hospital population, regarding incidence of aggression. Methods A retrospective audit of code grey event reports and medical records of patients admitted to 16 general medical‐surgical wards, during a six‐month period. All available records of 121 code grey events were audited. Demographic factors for patients with code grey events were compared with factors for 6472 patients admitted. Statistical tests included chi‐squared, bivariate and logistic regression. Results Diagnoses associated with increased risk of code grey were the following: delirium (11 times more likely) and dementia (seven times). Patients were more likely to have a code grey event if they were over 65 years of age (more than twice), were male (more than twice), were a recipient of Veterans' Affairs pension (four times), had never been married or had been admitted through the emergency department (almost twice). Conclusion This study adds to the current knowledge of the distinctive profile of patients in medical‐surgical settings who are associated with aggressive events. Relevance to clinical practice It is recommended that nurses increase their focus on assessment of identified risk factors and documentation of behaviours, to help predict aggressive events, and that this focus be supported by hospital safety and care policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosalyn Williamson & Kate Lauricella & Alexandra Browning & Elizabeth Tierney & Josephine Chen & Stephen Joseph & Julie Sharrock & Tom Trauer & Bridget Hamilton, 2014. "Patient factors associated with incidents of aggression in a general inpatient setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1144-1152, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:1144-1152
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12294
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eimear Muir‐Cochrane & Amanda Muller & Yanfen Fu & Candice Oster, 2020. "Role of security guards in Code Black events in medical and surgical settings: A retrospective chart audit," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 758-768, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:1144-1152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.