IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i5-6p820-828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of the relationship between adequacy of dialysis and quality of life and self‐care agency

Author

Listed:
  • Nurten Kalender
  • Nuran Tosun

Abstract

Aim and objectives To investigate the relationship between the dialysis adequacy and the quality of life and self‐care agency. Background Haemodialysis (HD), which is the leading treatment option for chronic renal failure (CRF), leads to significant changes in the life of the patient. These changes affecting almost all the dimensions of life also negatively affect the quality of life and self‐care agency. Design Descriptive study. Methods The research was conducted with a total of 112 patients who had been admitted to two private dialysis centres between May 2009 and September 2010, who met the research criteria. The Data Collection Form for the Socio‐demographic and Medical Characteristics, the Biochemical and Medical Parameters Form to determine the adequacy of dialysis, the SF‐36 Quality of Life Scale and the Self‐Care Agency Scale were used in the research. Results A significant relationship was found between Kt/V, one of the parameters used for the assessment of dialysis adequacy, and the emotional role scores of the SF‐36 Quality of Life Scale and between the URR level and physical functioning (r = +0·192, p = 0·045) and emotional role scores (r = +0·284, p = 0·003). No significant relationship could be found between the self‐care agency and the evaluated parameters. Conclusions Kt/V and URR, which have an effect on dialysis adequacy, may affect the quality of life. Our results are similar to those of previous studies, which showed that Kt/V and URR affect the quality of life. Relevance to clinical practice It was recommended to regularly control the parameters used for the assessment of dialysis adequacy and to evaluate their effects on the quality of life, to determine the most affected quality of life subparameters and to address these problems and solve them.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurten Kalender & Nuran Tosun, 2014. "Determination of the relationship between adequacy of dialysis and quality of life and self‐care agency," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 820-828, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:820-828
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12208
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manal Khudder Abdul Razak & Jawad Ibrahim Rasheed & Mudhafar Mohammed Meizel, 2018. "The Effect of Acidosis on Albumin Level in Patients Treated With Regular Hemodialysis (Single Center Study)," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(11), pages 1-57, November.
    2. Nurten Ozen & Tugba Cepken & Clemente Neves Sousa, 2021. "Does Adequate Hemodialysis Prevent Symptoms?: A National Cross-Sectional Survey," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(3), pages 334-342, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:820-828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.