IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i5-6p616-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When the body is past fixing: caring for bodies, caring for people

Author

Listed:
  • Kath M Melia

Abstract

Aims and objectives To discuss the social context within which end‐of‐life nursing care takes place and to consider palliative options of last resort and the differences between societal and professional views on these. Background The distinction between life and death is not so straightforward as was once the case. Resuscitation and the increasing capability of intensive care to ‘save’ patients have implications for nursing practice in a society where there is an increasing demand that individuals should be able to choose the time of their death. Methods This is a discursive paper. Conclusions There are differences between the professional view on end‐of‐life options and the societal debates calling for a more libertarian approach. The problem for professionals is that the call for choice of the individual involves a different approach to end‐of‐life care, an approach that does not sit well with current professional ethics. One way forward might be a gradual reconsidering of what end‐of‐life care might reasonably encompass. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses are the healthcare workers who have the most prolonged and intimate contact with bodies. The way in which we conceptualise the body is central to much of the work carried out in the transition between life and death and is an important part of nursing.

Suggested Citation

  • Kath M Melia, 2014. "When the body is past fixing: caring for bodies, caring for people," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 616-622, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:616-622
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12380
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniele Donati & Valentina Biagioli & Claudia Cianfrocca & Maria Grazia De Marinis & Daniela Tartaglini, 2019. "Compliance with Standard Precautions among Clinical Nurses: Validity and Reliability of the Italian Version of the Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale (CSPS-It)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Andrea Zuleta‐Benjumea & Silvia M Muñoz & Maria C Vélez & Alicia Krikorian, 2018. "Level of knowledge, emotional impact and perception about the role of nursing professionals concerning palliative sedation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3968-3978, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:616-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.