IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i5-6p605-615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intensive care survivors' experiences of ward‐based care: Meleis' theory of nursing transitions and role development among critical care outreach services

Author

Listed:
  • Pam Ramsay
  • Guro Huby
  • Andrew Thompson
  • Tim Walsh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the psychosocial needs of patients discharged from intensive care, the extent to which they are captured using existing theory on transitions in care and the potential role development of critical care outreach, follow‐up and liaison services. Background Intensive care patients are at an increased risk of adverse events, deterioration or death following ward transfer. Nurse‐led critical care outreach, follow‐up or liaison services have been adopted internationally to prevent these potentially avoidable sequelae. The need to provide patients with psychosocial support during the transition to ward‐based care has also been identified, but the evidence base for role development is currently limited. Design and methods Twenty participants were invited to discuss their experiences of ward‐based care as part of a broader study on recovery following prolonged critical illness. Psychosocial distress was a prominent feature of their accounts, prompting secondary data analysis using Meleis et al.'s mid‐range theory on experiencing transitions. Results Participants described a sense of disconnection in relation to profound debilitation and dependency and were often distressed by a perceived lack of understanding, indifference or insensitivity among ward staff to their basic care needs. Negotiating the transition between dependence and independence was identified as a significant source of distress following ward transfer. Participants varied in the extent to which they were able to express their needs and negotiate recovery within professionally mediated boundaries. Conclusion These data provide new insights into the putative origins of the psychosocial distress that patients experience following ward transfer. Relevance to clinical practice Meleis et al.'s work has resonance in terms of explicating intensive care patients' experiences of psychosocial distress throughout the transition to general ward–based care, such that the future role development of critical care outreach, follow‐up and liaison services may be more theoretically informed.

Suggested Citation

  • Pam Ramsay & Guro Huby & Andrew Thompson & Tim Walsh, 2014. "Intensive care survivors' experiences of ward‐based care: Meleis' theory of nursing transitions and role development among critical care outreach services," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 605-615, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:605-615
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12452
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ronny Enger & Birgitta Andershed, 2018. "Nurses’ experience of the transfer of ICU patients to general wards: A great responsibility and a huge challenge," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 186-194, January.
    2. Haiping Yu & Youqing Peng & Yunying Hung & Lin Zhou, 2018. "Immigrant nurses’ perceptions on cultural differences‐based job concerns: A phenomenological study in Shanghai China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(17-18), pages 3418-3425, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:605-615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.