IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i3-4p531-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Registered nurses' reflections on discussing sexuality with patients: responsibilities, doubts and fears

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Saunamäki
  • Maria Engström

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe registered nurses' reflections on discussing sexuality with patients. Background It is known that many diseases and treatments have a negative impact on sexual health. Despite these facts, registered nurses typically do not address sexual issues with patients. Design A descriptive design and a qualitative approach were used. Methods Interviews were conducted in 2010 with 10 registered nurses. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results The themes ‘Doing the right thing and doing good’, ‘Could've, would've, should've: a nurse's conflicting feelings’ and ‘I just don't talk about it: sexuality as a nontopic’ confirmed the notion that discussing sexuality in nursing care is still challenging and difficult for nurses, but also revealed that nurses who do talk to patients about sexual issues do so based on their strong sense of wanting to help. They felt a responsibility because of their knowledge in the area, but the topic also brought out conflicting feelings such as fear and embarrassment. Lack of time, support and places to talk to patients in private as well as prejudice were contributing factors to their not addressing sexuality. Some nurses also felt that sexuality was someone else's responsibility and a taboo subject. Conclusions Patients' sexuality is still surrounded by silence. But factors exist that can facilitate discussion of sexuality. Nurses have a key role in detecting ill‐health. This study suggests that when nurses use their knowledge and go beyond their comfort zone and address sexuality, they can identify patients' sexual problems. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses need to understand how their knowledge can help patients who are experiencing sexual problems; they also need support from the workplace and to have access to routines that reinforce the notion that sexuality is a topic worth discussing.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Saunamäki & Maria Engström, 2014. "Registered nurses' reflections on discussing sexuality with patients: responsibilities, doubts and fears," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3-4), pages 531-540, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:3-4:p:531-540
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12155
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingrid Egerod & Kathrine Wulff & Marian C Petersen, 2018. "Experiences and informational needs on sexual health in people with epilepsy or multiple sclerosis: A focus group investigation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2868-2876, July.
    2. Rachel Ollivier & Megan Aston & Sheri Price, 2019. "Let's talk about sex: A feminist poststructural approach to addressing sexual health in the healthcare setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 695-702, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:3-4:p:531-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.