IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i3-4p385-393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability and internal consistency of questionnaire for evaluating weight cycling in Southern Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Panarotto
  • Guilherme R Bosi
  • Márcio Neumann
  • Gustavo L de Braga
  • Sheila Hickmann
  • Carolina R Marcki

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine the reliability and internal consistency of a questionnaire that was designed to assess weight cycling. Background A large part of the obese population attempt to lose weight. Of those who had lost at least 10% of their initial weight, 33·5% regained weight. This weight loss and regain is termed ‘weight cycling’. So far, no available validated instruments exist that are capable of identifying these patients. Design A quantitative study for the validation of a questionnaire. Methods The selected patients received a phone call from the researchers. On that occasion, they answered a questionnaire that contained eight questions about their current weight, their weight at 18 years of age and their history of weight cycling over the past two years. Approximately 20 days after the first phone call, the patients were re‐contacted and asked to respond again to the proposed questionnaire. The internal consistency and reliability were examined through a kappa index and a chi‐squared test. The questions that showed evidence of reliability and consistency composed the final questionnaire. Results The final questionnaire consisted of six questions. An analysis of the test–retest kappa coefficient was moderate or greater for four of the six objective questions. One of the two quantitative questions showed a strong correlation for the test/retest reliability, and the other showed a strong correlation with the gold standard. An analysis of the internal consistency between a composition of questions 5 and 6 with question 4 showed moderate agreement, which increased when it was adjusted for the same cut‐off point. The agreement between patients classified as ‘weight cyclers’ was higher than 80% in both tests. Conclusions The Questionnaire to Assess Weight Cycling provided evidence of reliability and internal consistency. Relevance to clinical practice Evaluating weight cycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Panarotto & Guilherme R Bosi & Márcio Neumann & Gustavo L de Braga & Sheila Hickmann & Carolina R Marcki, 2014. "Reliability and internal consistency of questionnaire for evaluating weight cycling in Southern Brazil," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3-4), pages 385-393, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:3-4:p:385-393
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:3-4:p:385-393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.