IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i3-4p352-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity and reliability of Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients

Author

Listed:
  • Ayse Cil Akinci
  • Rukiye Pinar

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To investigate the validity and reliability of the Caregiver Burden Scale in family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. Background. In Turkey, there is a need for a multi‐dimensional instrument to evaluate the caregiver burden in people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases. Design. A methodological study. Methods. The study sample consisted of 161 family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. The forward‐backward translation method was used to develop the Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale. The reliability was based on internal consistency investigated by Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlation. The factorial construct validity of the scale was tested with confirmatory factor analysis. By means of convergent and divergent validity, correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) and correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and the Maslach Burnout Scale were investigated. Results. Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlations results suggested that there was good internal reliability. We found five underlying factors similar to original Scale’s five‐factor solution. The confirmatory factor analysis five‐factor model represented an acceptable fit. Factor loadings were significant, with standardised loadings ranging from 0·43–0·81. By means of divergent validity, all sub‐dimension scores and the total score of the Caregiver Burden Scale were negatively correlated with the SF‐36, whereas there was a positive correlation with the emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation subscales of the Maslach Burnout Scale as expected. Conclusion. These results suggest that the Caregiver Burden Scale is a reliable and valid instrument which can be used with confidence in Turkish caregivers for haemodialysis patients to screen caregiver burden. Relevance to clinical practice. The burden experienced by people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases can be evaluated with the Caregiver Burden Scale. Additionally, the Caregiver Burden Scale can be used in the evaluation of the effectiveness of attempts to decrease caregiver burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayse Cil Akinci & Rukiye Pinar, 2014. "Validity and reliability of Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3-4), pages 352-360, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:3-4:p:352-360
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04235.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04235.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04235.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:3-4:p:352-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.