IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i23-24p3434-3448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The contribution of nurse consultants in England to the public health leadership agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Franks

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the contribution of nurse consultants in relation to UK public health outcomes by contrasting the health and public health skills frameworks with a study of the role of nurse consultants. Background Nurse consultants are the most senior advanced nurse practitioners in the UK. They work clinically, lead, research, develop policy and disseminate knowledge. Design A synthesis of research and data from the UK professional skills frameworks with data from a mixed‐methods study of the role of nurse consultants. Method Data collected from nurse consultants and stakeholders in England (n = 10) were analysed to identify issues impacting on the skills, competencies and effectiveness of advanced nurses. This was contrasted with the skills and career frameworks for public health and advanced healthcare practice. Results Nurse consultants use their clinical expertise to lead practice, facilitate change and monitor effectiveness. Within healthcare organisations, they contribute servicewide to the implementation of public health policy, service delivery and policy development, mirroring expected competencies and improved health outcomes. Two barriers were identified. First, that there was little time or will for nurse consultants to undertake research, precluding them from demonstrating their value. Second, that a lack of interprofessional understanding and support of their roles meant that their worth was often not appreciated by decision‐makers. Conclusions Nurse consultants lead and influence public health on many levels and need support to develop needs‐led and evidence‐based local, national and international public health practice and policy development. Relevance to clinical practice This research contributes to the global discussion currently being held about the nomenclature of advanced nurse practitioner roles, their scope and influence. The challenge for nurses to contribute meaningfully to public health structures at an advanced level is a concern for all nations seeking the common goal of addressing public health needs within their populations and suggests that further development of our understanding of the potential contribution of advanced nurses is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Franks, 2014. "The contribution of nurse consultants in England to the public health leadership agenda," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3434-3448, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3434-3448
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12593
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Christensen, 2011. "Advancing nursing practice: redefining the theoretical and practical integration of knowledge," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 873-881, March.
    2. Valerie A Woodward & Christine Webb & Morag Prowse, 2006. "Nurse consultants: organizational influences on role achievement," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 272-280, March.
    3. Ann Humphreys & Janet Richardson & Elizabeth Stenhouse & Mary Watkins, 2010. "Assessing the impact of nurse and allied health professional consultants: developing an activity diary," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2565-2573, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean Teare & Maria Horne & Gill Clements & Mohammed A Mohammed, 2017. "A comparison of job descriptions for nurse practitioners working in out‐of‐hours primary care services: implications for workforce planning, patients and nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5-6), pages 707-716, March.
    2. Michelle Giles & Vicki Parker & Rebecca Mitchell, 2016. "Examining Nurse Consultant connectivity: An Australian mixed method study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 154-162, June.
    3. Michelle Giles & Vicki Parker & Jane Conway & Rebecca Mitchell, 2018. "Knowing how to get things done: Nurse consultants as clinical leaders," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1981-1993, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krista Jokiniemi & Anna‐Maija Pietilä & Jari Kylmä & Kaisa Haatainen, 2012. "Advanced nursing roles: A systematic review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 421-431, September.
    2. Christine Atsalos & Karen Biggs & Sabine Boensch & Fiona Lee Gavegan & Susan Heath & Marlene Payk & Grace Trapolini, 2014. "How clinical nurse and midwifery consultants optimise patient care in a tertiary referral hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2874-2885, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3434-3448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.