IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i5-6p890-901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do mood and the receipt of work‐based support influence nurse perceived quality of care delivery? A behavioural diary study

Author

Listed:
  • Martyn C Jones
  • Derek Johnston

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the effect of nurse mood in the worst event of shift (negative affect, positive affect), receipt of work‐based support from managers and colleagues, colleague and patient involvement on perceived quality of care delivery. Background While the effect of the work environment on nurse mood is well documented, little is known about the effects of the worst event of shift on the quality of care delivered by nurses. Design This behavioural diary study employed a within‐subject and between‐subject designs incorporating both cross‐sectional and longitudinal elements. Methods One hundred and seventy‐one nurses in four large district general hospitals in England completed end‐of‐shift computerised behavioural diaries over three shifts to explore the effects of the worst clinical incident of shift. Diaries measured negative affect, positive affect, colleague involvement, receipt of work‐based support and perceived quality of care delivery. Analysis used multilevel modelling (mlwin 2.19; Centre for Multi‐level Modelling, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK). Results High levels of negative affect and low levels of positive affect reported in the worst clinical incident of shift were associated with reduced perceived quality of care delivery. Receipt of managerial support and its interaction with negative affect had no relationship with perceived quality of care delivery. Perceived quality of care delivery deteriorated the most when the nurse reported a combination of high negative affect and no receipt of colleague support in the worst clinical incident of shift. Perceived quality of care delivery was also particularly influenced when the nurse reported low positive affect and colleague actions contributed to the problem. Conclusions Receipt of colleague support is particularly salient in protecting perceived quality of care delivery, especially if the nurse also reports high levels of negative affect in the worst event of shift. Relevance to clinical practice The effect of work‐based support on care delivery is complex and requires further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Martyn C Jones & Derek Johnston, 2013. "Do mood and the receipt of work‐based support influence nurse perceived quality of care delivery? A behavioural diary study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 890-901, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:890-901
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rena Bina & Saralee Glasser & Mira Honovich & Yona Ferber & Samira Alfayumi-Zeadna, 2022. "The Role of Organizational Factors in Nurses’ Perceived Preparedness to Screen, Intervene and Refer in Cases of Suspected Postpartum Depression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:890-901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.