IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i5-6p856-865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' perceptions of standardised assessment and prevention of complications in an ICU

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Lam Soh
  • Patricia M Davidson
  • Gavin Leslie
  • Michelle DiGiacomo
  • Kim Geok Soh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe nurses' perceptions of evidence‐based recommendations to prevent complications in a Malaysian intensive care unit. Background Ventilator‐associated pneumonia, catheter‐related blood stream infection and pressure ulcer are three frequent adverse events in the intensive care unit. Implementing evidenced‐based practice is critical in prevention of these complications. Design A qualitative focus group study. Methods Focus groups were conducted with nurses in the intensive care unit of a regional hospital in Malaysia following evidence‐based interventions. Focus group transcripts were analysed using the method of thematic analyses. Results Thirty‐four nurses participated in eight focus groups. The main themes derived from the interviews: (1) nurses' knowledge impacts on the change process; (2) initial resistance, ambivalence and movement to acceptance; and (3) hierarchical organisational structure can hinder the change process. Conclusion Enhancing nurses' knowledge and attitudes of evidence‐based practice, providing them with tools to monitor their clinical practice, and empowering them to change practice are likely to be important in influencing clinical outcomes. Increasing the emphasis on evidence‐based practice in nursing curricula and engaging in cultural change processes in the workplace are necessary to improve clinical outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice These findings provide valuable information for implementing clinical practice improvement interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Lam Soh & Patricia M Davidson & Gavin Leslie & Michelle DiGiacomo & Kim Geok Soh, 2013. "Nurses' perceptions of standardised assessment and prevention of complications in an ICU," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 856-865, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:856-865
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:856-865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.