IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i5-6p838-847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A worldwide investigation of critical care research coordinators’ self‐reported role and professional development priorities: the winner survey

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn M Eastwood
  • Brigit Roberts
  • Ged Williams
  • Claire M Rickard

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To describe the self‐reported role and professional development priorities of research coordinators in different regions of the world. Background. Research coordinators employed in critical care settings provide clinical and technical expertise in the development, conduct and completion of clinical research studies. Knowledge of this specialised role is well established in some parts of the world, yet emerging in others. Design. Descriptive exploratory study involving research coordinators outside of Australia and New Zealand. Method. An anonymous, structured, multiple‐choice, web‐based questionnaire conducted between April–May 2011. Results. There were 80 respondents from North America (61%), Europe (29%) and Latin America (10%). The majority of respondents performed data collection and obtained informed consent, and half had presented study findings at conferences or wrote scholarly articles, despite a greater willingness to do so. Requisite skills for the research coordinator role included clinical research knowledge, creative problem solving and the ability to identify/resolve ethical questions. ‘Best’ reported aspects of the role were promotion of evidence‐based clinical practice, intellectual stimulation and autonomy. ‘Worst’ aspects included heavy workload, lack of funding and recognition. Conclusion. Research coordinators working in critical care settings collect data, require clinical research knowledge and problem‐solving skills and are interested in, but have less confidence in, dissemination of research findings. They feel isolated with a lack of support and inadequate remuneration for the effort and time required to maintain the high standards of their role. This is outweighed by the satisfaction derived from promoting the research process and autonomy. Further observational studies aimed at clarifying and advancing the role of the research coordinator is warranted. Relevance to clinical practice. This study offers insight into the global roles and responsibilities as reported by research coordinators employed in critical care settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn M Eastwood & Brigit Roberts & Ged Williams & Claire M Rickard, 2013. "A worldwide investigation of critical care research coordinators’ self‐reported role and professional development priorities: the winner survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 838-847, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:838-847
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04230.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04230.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04230.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:838-847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.