IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i5-6p698-709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can we trust the new generation of infrared tympanic thermometers in clinical practice?

Author

Listed:
  • Berit Haugan
  • Anne K Langerud
  • Håvard Kalvøy
  • Kathrine F Frøslie
  • Else Riise
  • Heidi Kapstad

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To explore the reliability and validity of the new generation of infrared tympanic thermometers, comparing with rectal and core temperature, and to decide their applicability to clinical practice. Background. Digital contact thermometers for rectal measurements and infrared tympanic thermometers are the most common way to measure patients’ temperature. Previous studies of the infrared tympanic thermometers revealed misdiagnosis, and validity of early models was questioned. Design. Reliability and validity study. Methods. Temperature was measured with two infrared tympanic thermometers brands in both ears and compared with rectal temperature twice a day at the ward (n = 200). At the intensive care unit, patients (n = 42) underwent the same measurement procedures every fourth hour for 24 hours. In addition, core temperature was measured. Statistical analyses included descriptive and mixed models analyses. Results. Ward: Infrared tympanic thermometers measured the temperature lower than the rectal temperature. Descriptive statistics indicate higher variation in temperature measurements made in the ear. No statistically significant difference in temperature was found for left ear vs. right ear. Intensive care unit: The mean rectal temperature was higher than the mean core and ear temperature. Mixed models analyses of the temperatures at the ward and the intensive care unit showed the same overall trends, but with less discrepancy between the two infrared tympanic thermometers brands, compared with the rectal temperature. Only rectal temperature measurements differed significantly from the core temperature. Conclusion. Our study shows good reliability using the new generation of infrared tympanic thermometers. We found good agreement between core and infrared tympanic thermometers at the intensive care unit, but the measuring inaccuracy for infrared tympanic thermometers was greater than expected. Relevance to clinical practice. The new generation of infrared tympanic thermometers may be used in clinical practice, but it is important to do repeatedly measurements if there is discrepancy between the temperature and the observation of the patient condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Berit Haugan & Anne K Langerud & Håvard Kalvøy & Kathrine F Frøslie & Else Riise & Heidi Kapstad, 2013. "Can we trust the new generation of infrared tympanic thermometers in clinical practice?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 698-709, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:698-709
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04077.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04077.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04077.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:698-709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.