IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i5-6p690-697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of life in cervical cancer patients treated with radiation therapy

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Pasek
  • Lilia Suchocka
  • Krzysztof Urbański

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the quality of life in hospitalised patients with cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy. Background Aside from clinical variables, the quality of life should be considered in the planning and monitoring of the therapeutic process in patients with cancer. Although it is widely known that this parameter can have a considerable impact on the therapeutic outcome, it is not routinely screened in oncological patients. Design Survey. Methods The study was performed in six cancer centres in Poland between June 2004–December 2005, and included 205 women hospitalised for any stage of cervical cancer. The EORTC QLQ‐C30 questionnaire (v.3) was used to evaluate the patients' quality of life. The survey was conducted three times: (1) stage 1 – before treatment, on admission, (2) stage 2 – after treatment, at discharge, and (3) stage 3 – five to six months after treatment. Results Physical functioning was assessed the worst before the radiation treatment and increased gradually throughout further stages; all interstage differences proved to be significant. In contrast, emotional functioning was scored the highest before the initiation of the treatment and was the lowest at stage 2, a difference that proved to be significant. Role functioning was highest immediately after the treatment and the lowest prior to the treatment. Differences between stages proved to be significant. Financial problems increased their negative impact on the quality of patients' lives significantly throughout consecutive stages of this study. Age and cancer stage did not significantly influence the way participants perceived their global health, physical, cognitive, emotional and social functioning, nor their financial difficulties. Overall, the quality of life was evaluated as highest immediately after the end of radiotherapy. Conclusion Although this study revealed that patients with cervical cancer subjected to radiotherapy are satisfied with their global quality of life, attention should be paid to certain dimensions of the latter (i.e. emotional functioning and role functioning) during post‐treatment period. Relevance to clinical practice The ability to performing everyday activities independently is perceived as the most important during all stages of the cervical cancer treatment, and therefore, appropriate support in this matter is necessary on the part of the nursing personnel.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Pasek & Lilia Suchocka & Krzysztof Urbański, 2013. "Quality of life in cervical cancer patients treated with radiation therapy," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 690-697, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:690-697
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04350.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04350.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04350.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:690-697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.