IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i5-6p669-680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the effectiveness of hospital discharge planning and follow‐up in the primary care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Abad‐Corpa
  • Tania Royo‐Morales
  • Javier Iniesta‐Sánchez
  • Andrés Carrillo‐Alcaraz
  • Juan José Rodríguez‐Mondejar
  • Ángeles Rosario Saez‐Soto
  • Mª Carmen Vivo‐Molina

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of protocolised intervention for hospital discharge and follow‐up in the primary care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality internationally. Design: A quasi‐experimental design was adopted, with a control group and it was pseudorandomised by services. Methods: Patients with COPD admitted to two tertiary‐level public hospitals in Spain were recruited (2007–2008). The outcome variables included: readmission rate, patient satisfaction (LOPSS12), quality of life (St. George′s Respiratory Questionnaire) and level of knowledge about COPD. 48 hours after admission, both groups were evaluated by specialist coordinating nurses. At the hospital, a coordinating nurse visited each patient in the experimental group every 24 hours to identify the main caregiver, provide information about the disease, explain treatment, identify care problems and needs and facilitate communication between professionals. 24 hours after discharge, the coordinating nurses informed the primary care nurses about patient discharge. The two nurses made the first home visit together. There were follow‐up phone calls at 2, 6, 12 and 24 weeks after discharge. A total of 143 patients were recruited (Intervention group=56; Control group=87). Results: The results showed a significant improvement in the evolution of quality of life, at 12 and 24 weeks after discharge; the level of knowledge about COPD revealed significant differences between the groups. There were no differences according to satisfaction or readmission rate. Multivariate analysis (non‐conditional logistic regression) showed the intervention to be ineffective in reducing the readmission rate. Conclusions: The planning of discharge for patients with COPD is effective in terms of improving the patients’ quality of life and level of knowledge about the disease. Relevance to clinical practice: The characteristics of patients with COPD make it necessary to include them in hospital discharge planning programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Abad‐Corpa & Tania Royo‐Morales & Javier Iniesta‐Sánchez & Andrés Carrillo‐Alcaraz & Juan José Rodríguez‐Mondejar & Ángeles Rosario Saez‐Soto & Mª Carmen Vivo‐Molina, 2013. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of hospital discharge planning and follow‐up in the primary care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 669-680, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:669-680
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04155.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04155.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04155.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:669-680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.