IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i5-6p621-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self‐management programmes for people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a call for a reconceptualisation

Author

Listed:
  • Helga Jonsdottir

Abstract

Aims and objectives To synthesise findings from previously published studies on the effectiveness of self‐management programmes for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Background Self‐management is a widely valued concept to address contemporary issues of chronic health problems. Yet, findings of self‐management programmes for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are indecisive. Design Literature review of (1) previously published systematic reviews and (2) an integrative literature review. Method Synthesis of findings from previously published systematic reviews (n = 4) of the effectiveness of self‐management programmes for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and an integrated review that was performed on papers published between January 2007–June 2012 (n = 9). Results Findings demonstrate that there are few studies on the effectiveness of self‐management programmes on people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease despite more than a decade of research activities. Outcomes of the studies reveal some increase in health‐related quality of life and reduction in use of healthcare resources. The methodological approaches vary, and the sample size is primarily small. Families are not acknowledged. Features of patient‐centredness exist in self‐management programmes, particularly in the more recent articles. Conclusions The effectiveness of self‐management programmes for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remains indecisive. Relevance to clinical practice A reconceptualisation of self‐management programmes is called for with attention to a family‐centred, holistic and relational care focusing on living with and minimising the handicapping consequences of the health problems in their entirety.

Suggested Citation

  • Helga Jonsdottir, 2013. "Self‐management programmes for people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a call for a reconceptualisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 621-637, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:621-637
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marit Leine & Astrid Klopstad Wahl & Christine Råheim Borge & Magne Hustavenes & Hilde Bondevik, 2017. "Feeling safe and motivated to achieve better health: Experiences with a partnership‐based nursing practice programme for in‐home patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2755-2764, September.
    2. Ingrid Charlotte Andersen & Thora Grothe Thomsen & Poul Bruun & Uffe Bødtger & Lise Hounsgaard, 2017. "Patients' and their family members' experiences of participation in care following an acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A phenomenological‐hermeneutic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4877-4889, December.
    3. Wenjing Tu & Guihua Xu & Shizheng Du, 2015. "Structure and content components of self‐management interventions that improve health‐related quality of life in people with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review, meta‐analysis and meta‐reg," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2695-2709, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:621-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.