IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i3-4p579-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reported medication errors after introducing an electronic medication management system

Author

Listed:
  • Bernice Redley
  • Mari Botti

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the effects of introducing an electronic medication management system on reported medication errors. Background Computerised medication management systems have been found to improve medication safety; however, introducing medication management system into healthcare environments can create unanticipated or new problems and opportunities for medication error. Design Descriptive analysis of medication error reports. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 359 incident reports drawn from the period of 1 May 2005–30 April 2006 across two hospital sites of a single not‐for‐profit private health service located in metropolitan Melbourne. Site A used a conventional pen and paper system for medication management, and Site B had introduced a computerised medication management system. Results Most medication errors occurred at the nurse administration (71·5%) and prescribing (16·4%) stages of delivery. The most common medication error type reported at Site A was omission (33%), and at Site B was wrong documentation (24·2%). A higher proportion of errors at the prescribing phase, and less nurse administration errors, were detected at Site B where the medication management system was in use. The incidence of other, less frequent errors was similar across the two hospital sites. Conclusions This examination of medication error reports suggests there are differences in the types of medication errors that are reported in association with the introduction of electronic medication management system compared to pen and paper system systems. The findings provide a new insight into the effects of introducing an electronic medication management system on the types of medication errors reported. Relevance to clinical practice The findings provide a new insight into the types of medication errors that are reported during implementation of an electronic medication management system. Extra support for physicians prescribing practices should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernice Redley & Mari Botti, 2013. "Reported medication errors after introducing an electronic medication management system," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 579-589, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:579-589
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04326.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04326.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04326.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janet Choo & Linda Johnston & Elizabeth Manias, 2014. "Effectiveness of an electronic inpatient medication record in reducing medication errors in Singapore," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 245-254, June.
    2. Tiina Syyrilä & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Marja Härkänen, 2020. "Communication issues contributing to medication incidents: Mixed‐method analysis of hospitals’ incident reports using indicator phrases based on literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2466-2481, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:579-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.