IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i3-4p569-578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

District nurses’ perceptions of the concept of delegating administration of medication to home care aides working in the municipality: A discrepancy between legal regulations and practice

Author

Listed:
  • Asa G Craftman
  • Eva von Strauss
  • Susanne L Rudberg
  • Margareta Westerbotn

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To describe district nurses’ perceptions of the concept of delegating medication management to unlicensed personnel working in municipal social care. Background. The delegation of medical tasks involves responsibility and is regulated by law to avoid damage and injuries and to protect the patient. The delegation of the administration of medication is a multifaceted task. The delegating district nurse is responsible for the outcome and should also follow up the delegated task. Design. A descriptive qualitative study, involving semi‐structured interviews and content analysis. Methods. Twenty district nurses were interviewed. The interviews were audio taped. The data were collected from April 2009–August 2010 and analysed using content analysis. Results. The findings revealed that the statutes of delegation appear to be incompatible with practice, however, mostly due to lack of time. Communication between district nurses and home care aides, as well as tutoring, was regarded as important. The district nurses found it imperative to be available to the home care aides and made an effort to create a trusting atmosphere. Conclusions. District nurses cannot manage their workload without delegating the administration of medication in the present organisational model of health care and social care. The statutes regarding delegating medicine tasks are also cumbersome and difficult to incorporate for district nurses who are responsible for the delegation. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings elucidate the current situation as regards district nurses and the need to delegate the administration of medication. Health care and social care for home‐dwelling older patients, as well as statutes, needs to be evaluated and updated to meet and be prepared for the increasing demands of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Asa G Craftman & Eva von Strauss & Susanne L Rudberg & Margareta Westerbotn, 2013. "District nurses’ perceptions of the concept of delegating administration of medication to home care aides working in the municipality: A discrepancy between legal regulations and practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 569-578, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:569-578
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04262.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04262.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04262.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Åke Grundberg & Anna Hansson & Pernilla Hillerås & Dorota Religa, 2016. "District nurses' perspectives on detecting mental health problems and promoting mental health among community‐dwelling seniors with multimorbidity," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2590-2599, September.
    2. Åsa Gransjön Craftman & Charlotte Grape & Katarina Ringnell & Margareta Westerbotn, 2016. "Registered nurses' experience of delegating the administration of medicine to unlicensed personnel in residential care homes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3189-3198, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:569-578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.