IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i3-4p445-455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Early re‐presentation to hospital after discharge from an acute medical unit: perspectives of older patients, their family caregivers and health professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Slatyer
  • Christine Toye
  • Aurora Popescu
  • Jeanne Young
  • Anne Matthews
  • Andrew Hill
  • D James Williamson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the perceptions of older patients who re‐presented to hospital within 28 days of discharge from an acute medical unit (AMU), their family caregivers and appropriately experienced health professionals. Background Hospitals are increasingly using AMUs to provide rapid assessment and treatment for medical patients. Evidence of efficacy is building, however in‐depth exploration of the experiences of older patients who re‐present to hospital soon after discharge from an AMU, and those who care for them, appears to be lacking. Design A qualitative, descriptive design was used. Methods In 2007, our team purposively sampled older patients who re‐presented to hospital within 28 days of discharge from an AMU (n = 12), family caregivers (n = 15), and health professionals (n = 35). Data were collected using semi‐structured interviews and subjected to thematic content analysis. Results Four themes emerged: the health trajectory, communication challenges, discharge readiness and the decision to return. Re‐presentation to hospital was seen as part of a declining health trajectory. The AMU was viewed as treating acute illness well, however patients and family caregivers left hospital with limited understanding of underlying health problems and, therefore, ill‐prepared for future health crises. Conclusion There are clear benefits for older patients from AMUs, which expedite treatment for acute health crises. However, AMU discharge planning needs to consider patients' overall health status and likely future needs to optimise outcomes. Such a requirement is problematic in the context of acute time pressures. Relevance to clinical practice To ensure prompt and expert attention to key aspects of discharge planning for older people leaving AMUs, there is a role for in‐depth clinical expertise in the care of older people facing deteriorating life‐limiting conditions. Therefore, a leadership role for nurses with geriatric and palliative care expertise, alongside medical and allied health professionals, merits attention in this context.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Slatyer & Christine Toye & Aurora Popescu & Jeanne Young & Anne Matthews & Andrew Hill & D James Williamson, 2013. "Early re‐presentation to hospital after discharge from an acute medical unit: perspectives of older patients, their family caregivers and health professionals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 445-455, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:445-455
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pei-Hsin Yang & Meng-Chih Lin & Yi-Ying Liu & Chia-Lun Lee & Nai-Jen Chang, 2019. "Effect of Nutritional Intervention Programs on Nutritional Status and Readmission Rate in Malnourished Older Adults with Pneumonia: A Randomized Control Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Helen Walthall & Brian Dolan & Debra Jackson, 2019. "Trapped in care: Recognising and responding to frailty as a cause of delayed transfers of care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 5-6, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:445-455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.