IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i3-4p389-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggressive continuous passive motion exercise does not improve knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty

Author

Listed:
  • Lan‐Hui Chen
  • Chung‐Hwan Chen
  • Sung‐Yen Lin
  • Song‐Hsiung Chien
  • Jiing Yuan Su
  • Chao‐Yung Huang
  • Hui‐Yu Wang
  • Chih‐Liang Chou
  • Tsung‐Yu Tsai
  • Yuh‐Min Cheng
  • Hsuan‐Ti Huang

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of continuous passive motion on the range of motion, postoperative pain and life quality of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty within six months after the operation. Background. Total knee arthroplasty reduces pain and improves range of motion of the osteoarthritic knee joint. Continuous passive motion increases postoperative movement, but there is some controversy regarding whether aggressive continuous passive motion can improve range of motion or life quality, and whether it induces more pain. Design. A prospective controlled study was conducted in a medical centre in Taiwan from January to December 2006. Methods. One hundred and seven patients were recruited. The patients underwent the basic rehabilitation protocols (the control group) or the basic rehabilitation protocols and additional daily use of continuous passive motion for more than six hours per day (the experimental group). The range of motion, modified Short Form‐36 (SF‐36) and semi‐quantitative visual analogue scale were recorded. Results. Range of motion increased from 109° preoperatively to 125° at six months postoperatively in the treatment group and from 111° preoperatively to 125° at six months postoperatively in the control group. Visual analogue scale decreased from 7·78 preoperatively to 0·37 at six months postoperatively in the treatment group and from 7·92 preoperatively to 0·21 at six months postoperatively in the control group. The SF‐36 improved from 3·76 preoperatively to 1·77 at six months postoperatively in the treatment group and from 3·68 preoperatively to 1·83 at six months postoperatively in the control group. There was no significant difference in range of motion, visual analogue scale and SF‐36 between groups at each visit. Conclusion. With the advances in total knee arthroplasty surgical technique, aggressive continuous passive motion does not provide obvious benefits. Relevance to clinical practice. Total knee arthroplasty can alleviate pain and improve range of motion, but aggressive continuous passive motion does not provide additional benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Lan‐Hui Chen & Chung‐Hwan Chen & Sung‐Yen Lin & Song‐Hsiung Chien & Jiing Yuan Su & Chao‐Yung Huang & Hui‐Yu Wang & Chih‐Liang Chou & Tsung‐Yu Tsai & Yuh‐Min Cheng & Hsuan‐Ti Huang, 2013. "Aggressive continuous passive motion exercise does not improve knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 389-394, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:389-394
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04106.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04106.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04106.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:389-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.