IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i21-22p3225-3234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘The situation and the uncertainty about the coming result scared me but interaction with the radiographers helped me through’: a qualitative study on patients' experiences of magnetic resonance imaging examinations

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Carlsson
  • Eva Carlsson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe patients' expectations before and experiences during a head‐first magnetic resonance imaging scan. Background Previous studies have reported that patients experience fear and anxiety leading to discomfort before, during and after magnetic resonance imaging scans. Frequent problems persist in producing high‐quality images due to motion artefacts. These results imply a need for improvement of patient conditions to allow for the added benefit of better diagnostic quality. Provision of extended written information has not appeared to reduce patients' stress, while interaction with staff has been described as the most important factor for reducing such feelings. Design and methods A qualitative, phenomenological approach. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted, and data were analysed with systematic text condensation. Results The experiences of the ten participants were encapsulated by the main theme: ‘The situation and the uncertainty about the coming result scared me but interaction with the radiographers helped me through’. Subthemes were ‘Prescan preparation’, ‘Mastering threats to self‐control’ and ‘Personal achievements by completing the scan’. Conclusions Our study has provided a deeper understanding of the expectations before, and experiences during, a head‐first magnetic resonance imaging scan. Valuable insight into patients' apprehension about written and verbal information was obtained. The patients reported how they coped with the unfamiliar and stressful magnetic resonance imaging scanning procedure. A trustful dialogue with the radiographer was described as being crucial for patients' ability to manage fear, discomfort and feelings of loss of self‐control. We suggest a need for individualised information based on patient participation. Relevance to clinical practice Radiographers, as well as nurses caring for patients who will undergo magnetic resonance imaging examinations, should recognise the difficulties inherent in written information. It is also of importance to adjust the patient–radiographer interaction to address patients' expressions of worries about the scanning procedure or the following result.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Carlsson & Eva Carlsson, 2013. "‘The situation and the uncertainty about the coming result scared me but interaction with the radiographers helped me through’: a qualitative study on patients' experiences of magnetic resonance imagi," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3225-3234, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3225-3234
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12416
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Britt‐Marie Ahlander & Jan Engvall & Eva Maret & Elisabeth Ericsson, 2018. "Positive effect on patient experience of video information given prior to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: A clinical trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1250-1261, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3225-3234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.