IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i21-22p3217-3224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Striving for best practice: standardising New Zealand nursing procedures, 1930–1960

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela J Wood
  • Katherine Nelson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify how nurses in the past determined best practice, using the context of New Zealand, 1930–1960. Background In the current context of evidence‐based practice, nurses strive to provide the best care, based on clinical research. We cannot assume that nurses in the past, prior to the evidence‐based practice movement, did not also have a deliberate process for pursuing best practice. Discovering historical approaches to determining best practice will enrich our understanding of how nurses' current efforts are part of a continuing commitment to ensuring quality care. Design Historical research. Methods The records of the Nursing Education Committee of the New Zealand Registered Nurses' Association, 1940–1959, and the 309 issues of New Zealand's nursing journal, Kai Tiaki, 1930–1960, were analysed to identify the profession's approach to ensuring best practice. This approach was then interpreted within the international context, particularly Canada and the USA. Results For nearly 30 years, nurse leaders collaborated in undertaking national surveys of training hospitals requesting information on different nursing practices. They subsequently distributed instructions for a range of procedures and other aspects of nursing care to standardise practice. Standardising nursing care was an effective way to ensure quality nursing at a time when hospital care was delivered mostly by nurses in training. The reasons for and timing of standardisation of nursing care in New Zealand differed from the international move towards standardisation, particularly in the USA. Conclusions Historically, nurses also pursued best practice, based on standardising nursing procedures. Relevance to clinical practice Examining the antecedents of the present evidence‐based approach to care reminds us that the process and reasons for determining best practice change through time. As knowledge and practice continually change, current confident assertions of best practice should and will continue to be challenged in future.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela J Wood & Katherine Nelson, 2013. "Striving for best practice: standardising New Zealand nursing procedures, 1930–1960," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3217-3224, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3217-3224
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12456
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3217-3224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.