IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i19-20p2876-2882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative exploration of nurses' decisions to activate rapid response teams

Author

Listed:
  • Kim S Astroth
  • Wendy M Woith
  • Stephen J Stapleton
  • R Joseph Degitz
  • Sheryl H Jenkins

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify barriers and facilitators to nurses' decisions regarding activation of rapid response teams (RRTs) in hospitals. Background Hospitalised patients in the United States who experience cardiopulmonary arrest seldom recover. Most of these patients show signs of clinical deterioration prior to cardiopulmonary arrest. RRTs have been shown to decrease the incidence of cardiopulmonary arrest by bringing needed resources to unstable patients. Despite the evidence in support of the activation of RRTs, nurses do not always use this resource. Nurses' decisions to activate or not to activate the RRT are not clearly understood. Design We used a qualitative design for this study. Methods A purposive sample of 15 medical/surgical nurses was recruited from a small medical centre in the Midwest. Researchers used semistructured, open‐ended questions to elicit subject responses regarding facilitators and barriers to activating RRTs. Results Themes emerged and were categorised as facilitators and barriers to calling the RRT. Facilitators and barriers were then subdivided into distinct subthemes: RRT characteristics and unit culture. The expertise of the RRT members and support and encouragement from nursing unit colleagues and leaders emerged as two potential facilitators. Communication of the RRT members and calling the physician first emerged as two potential barriers. We also identified educational factors that were not clearly facilitators or barriers to calling the RRT. Conclusions Further study is needed using quantitative designs with larger sample sizes. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses can build upon knowledge of facilitators and barriers related to RRT characteristics and nursing unit culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim S Astroth & Wendy M Woith & Stephen J Stapleton & R Joseph Degitz & Sheryl H Jenkins, 2013. "Qualitative exploration of nurses' decisions to activate rapid response teams," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(19-20), pages 2876-2882, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:19-20:p:2876-2882
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12067
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gooske Douw & Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Arthur R H van Zanten & Johannes G van der Hoeven & Lisette Schoonhoven, 2017. "Capturing early signs of deterioration: the dutch‐early‐nurse‐worry‐indicator‐score and its value in the Rapid Response System," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2605-2613, September.
    2. Doug Elliott & Emily Allen & Sharon McKinley & Lin Perry & Christine Duffield & Margaret Fry & Robyn Gallagher & Rick Iedema & Michael Roche, 2016. "User acceptance of observation and response charts with a track and trigger system: a multisite staff survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2211-2222, August.
    3. Jørghild Karlotte Jensen & Randi Skår & Bodil Tveit, 2018. "The impact of Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems on nurses’ competence: An integrative literature review and synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1256-1274, April.
    4. Emily Allen & Doug Elliott & Debra Jackson, 2017. "Recognising and responding to in‐hospital clinical deterioration: An integrative review of interprofessional practice issues," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3990-4012, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:19-20:p:2876-2882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.